It is obvious if you read the whole article which we know you didn't. So the problem here is your inability to read what you posted.
I already backed up my argument.
View attachment 42604
Week 1 - 2 TWP and given his poor fumble score of 28.1 then let's say PFF gave him a TWP play for the dropped snap although I think they graded him poorly but didnt give him a TWP because there was no chance at a recovery by the defense. So that is 1 passing almost int and 1 fumble TWP if I am being generous to you or 2 almost ints.
Week 2 - 3 TWPs and 2 Ints. There were no fumbles in this game so that is 2 actual ints and 1 almost int.
Week 3 - He had 2 ints but only one TWP so obviously PFF is saying one of the ints was not Caleb.
This is the int that is not on Caleb because again had both hands on it and deflected it to the DB. This proves my point about deflected passes by the offense not being TWP for the QB so again you were wrong moron.
This is also the game with the Latu strip sack so clearly it can't be a TWP as the obvious int that was a TWP is the below. So this is 1 passing TWP (actual int). And again you were wrong about the strip sack being a TWP.
Week 4 -
This is the Rams where there was a strip sack but no TWP so clearly the strip sack is not a TWP and again you are wrong that it is.
Week 5 - No ints or fumbles but 2 TWP so this has to be 2 almost ints.
Week 6 - One int and one TWP so the TWP is an actual int.
Weeks 8-10 - No ints, and no TWPs.
This means the Kramer fumble in week 8 could not have been recorded as a TWP. So again you were wrong.
So you missed 4 almost Ints for sure or 5 if we exclude the Titans fumble. Or more correctly we both know you didn't actually go back and watch the tape and you have been lying this whole time.
So we know 3 of the fumbles were never TWPs and we have 1 fumble where the fumble score is low but the D never had a chance to recover. That means the TWP rate for just passes is either 2.72% (8/294) or 3.1% (9/294). Under Brown it is 3.4%. So that would be an increase of either 25% or 9.67%. Neither is proof of skyrocketing sir.
I will also close that under Brown he faced much better teams and so your whole premise was flawed. To recap.
1. You were wrong about the fumbles because you didn't read your own article dumbass.
2. You were wrong about deflected passes because you didn't read and understand your own article dumbass.
3. You missed 4 or 5 almost ints because let's be honest you lied and didn't actually check.
4. You were wrong about a skyrocketing effect as the increase is clearly small sample size skewing and facing better competition. You were wrong because we both know your dumbass thought all fumbles were TWPs and you were calculation a 111% increase which we both know was dumb as hell.
