Thomas Brown for Head Coach

[remydat]

And I disagree and then you claim it’s crying and whining. When you disagree it’s not…go figure

This is why you’re a cuck

No it is crying and whining because you cant accept our opinions differ and you keep crying about it.

Once again you are free to disagree with me. No skin off my back.

 

[knoxville7]

No it is crying and whining because you cant accept our opinions differ and you keep crying about it.

Once again you are free to disagree with me. No skin off my back.

I do accept that our opinions differ.

Of course they differ, you’re an idiot and I’m not

 

[SugarWalls]

I dont recall claiming I have no feelings about him. My point was they arent strong enough for me to be gung ho about him.

I may like a girl enough to **** her. Doesnt mean I like her enough to marry her. Some of you are married to certain ideas like Harbaugh being HC of the Bears. I flirt with a lot of different ideas but none I am married to and therein lies the rub.

I actually never wanted harbaugh for HC, but this thought that we ‘couldn’t know’ if harbaugh is a better coach than eberflus is so laughably bad I had to address it.

You are assuming my position and making an additional assumption on top of the first that I am emotional about it.

Your logic is incorrect and you create false scenarios or very narrow scenarios to help suit your opinion.

 

[remydat]

I do accept that our opinions differ.

Of course they differ, you’re an idiot and I’m not

I feel the same about you but I respect your right to be an idiot.

 

[remydat]

I actually never wanted harbaugh for HC, but this thought that we ‘couldn’t know’ if harbaugh is a better coach than eberflus is so laughably bad I had to address it.

You are assuming my position and making an additional assumption on top of the first that I am emotional about it.

Your logic is incorrect and you create false scenarios or very narrow scenarios to help suit your opinion.

I said some of you. I did not say you specifically.

I think you confuse knowledge and belief. I said given how long he was gone from the NFL I dont know for sure he still has it.

You believed he did but you did not know because your belief doesnt become knowledge until it is proven. Doesnt matter how strongly you believe something to be true.

 

[SugarWalls]

I said some of you. I did not say you specifically.

I think you confuse knowledge and belief. I said given how long he was gone from the NFL I dont know for sure he still has it.

You believed he did but you did not know because your belief doesnt become knowledge until it is proven. Doesnt matter how strongly you believe something to be true.

Some of us use history as a potential indicator for future results. Like his previous success as a HC in the nfl, and his success at Michigan. I don’t believe his past was successful, it is factually true.

For whatever reason you chose to essentially negate all of his past as a HC and created a ridiculous scenario where you compared him to eberflus who only had failed as HC in the NFL. To say eberflus first 2 years were bad is also fact.

You are emotional as a bears fan (understandable), and you set up these silly scenarios because of it. It’s also why you are so consistently wrong. You almost always give the bears the benefit of any doubt, and you don’t do this in other situations.

The problem is you then pretend it’s all logic and the other people on here are emotional. You are an emotional poster masquerading as a logical thinker.

 

[remydat]

Some of us use history as a potential indicator for future results. Like his previous success as a HC in the nfl, and his success at Michigan. I don’t believe his past was successful, it is factually true.

For whatever reason you chose to essentially negate all of his past as a HC and created a ridiculous scenario where you compared him to eberflus who only had failed as HC in the NFL. To say eberflus first 2 years were bad is also fact.

You are emotional as a bears fan (understandable), and you set up these silly scenarios because of it. It’s also why you are so consistently wrong. You almost always give the bears the benefit of any doubt, and you don’t do this in other situations.

The problem is you then pretend it’s all logic and the other people on here are emotional. You are an emotional poster masquerading as a logical thinker.

Past performance doesnt guarantee future results is a mantra in my field. So no it is not a fact that past results will predict future results.

I simply said I will see how he and Flus perform this year. That isnt negating anything. That is judging them on actual results not past results because again past results dont guarantee future results.

I dont just give the Bears the benefit of doubt. I give everyone the benefit of the doubt hence why I said I would see how Harbaugh actually performs.

 

[SugarWalls]

Past performance doesnt gurantee future results is a mantra in my field. So no it is not a fact that past results will predict future results.

I simply said I will see how he and Flus perform this year. That isnt negating anything. That is judging them on actual results not past results.

I dont just give the Bears the benefit of doubt. I give everyone the benefit of the doubt hence why I said I would see how Harbaugh actually performs.

Right, I said ‘potential indicator’

You are basically saying past performance is irrelevant, we garner nothing from looking at it. Idk what field you are in but we are talking about football, not your field.

Idk why you have to go from guarantee to irrelevant.

Giving harbaugh the benefit of the doubt would have been to go as far as to say harbaugh will be good based on past experience.

Instead you gave the bears the benefit of the doubt and ignored past experience partly for the reason you stated, but as a result it also sets the scenario where eberflus past poor performance can now be ignored.

It’s a false situation that you crafted.

 

[remydat]

Right, I said ‘potential indicator’

You are basically saying past performance is irrelevant, we garner nothing from looking at it. Idk what field you are in but we are talking about football, not your field.

Idk why you have to go from guarantee to irrelevant.

Giving harbaugh the benefit of the doubt would have been to go as far as to say harbaugh will be good based on past experience.

Instead you gave the bears the benefit of the doubt and ignored past experience partly for the reason you stated, but as a result it also sets the scenario where eberflus past poor performance can now be ignored.

It’s a false situation that you crafted.

The relevant performance is his NFL performance which was a decade ago so no it isnt really relevant as a decade is a lng time. Of course if his NFL experience was much more recent then it would have more relevance.

I did consider Flus past performance but dicounted it because they clearly tore down the roster and sold off key pieces so there was no real expectation he was supposed to win with that roster. Hence why I said I would judge him on this year where we were clearly trying to compete.

By contrast Bosa and Mack restructured their contracts so they could stay with the Chargers. If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well.

Having said that if you put more stock in his past results then no skin off my back. I am not telling you not to. I am explaining why I dont.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

I may like a girl enough to **** her. Doesnt mean I like her enough to marry her.

What about dudes? Eberflus?

 

[mecha]

if I didn't know better I would say the vortexes are worsening over time

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

if I didn't know better I would say the vortexes are worsening over time

Global warming has an effect

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

By contrast Bosa and Mack restructured their contracts so they could stay with the Chargers. If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well.

This is such BS. Its not like Harbaugh needed Bosa and Mack in 2024 to 'cement' his reputation as a HC. Harbaugh is a proven winner. Also, I'm guessing the guys redid their contracts specifically because Harbaugh was their coach, yet you hold it against Harbaugh. I'm guessing you also hate college football coaches who recruit the best players.

You are the worst poster on CCS.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

You are basically saying past performance is irrelevant, we garner nothing from looking at it.

Its like thinking Tabula Rasadat will make his next post be insightful, knowledgeable and compelling. It hasn't happened yet....but it might!

 

[remydat]

What about dudes? Eberflus?

Nah that seems to be you guys department as yall deepthroating a coach who has nothing to do with the Bears at the moment.

This is such BS. Its not like Harbaugh needed Bosa and Mack in 2024 to 'cement' his reputation as a HC. Harbaugh is a proven winner. Also, I'm guessing the guys redid their contracts specifically because Harbaugh was their coach, yet you hold it against Harbaugh. I'm guessing you also hate college football coaches who recruit the best players.

You are the worst poster on CCS.

I did not hold anything against Harbaugh. I said keeping Bosa and Mack meant they were obviously trying to compete this year. By contrast trading Mack and Quinn made it obvious the Bears were rebuilding.

Reading is fundamental.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

I said keeping Bosa and Mack meant they were obviously trying to compete this year.

Thats not what you said....you said that the reason Harbaugh had success this year was because the GM didn't trade Mack and Bosa....awesome take! "If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well."

 

[remydat]

Thats not what you said....you said that the reason Harbaugh had success this year was because the GM didn't trade Mack and Bosa....awesome take! "If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well."

That is exactly what I said.

I did consider Flus past performance but dicounted it because they clearly tore down the roster and sold off key pieces so there was no real expectation he was supposed to win with that roster. Hence why I said I would judge him on this year where we were clearly trying to compete.

By contrast Bosa and Mack restructured their contracts so they could stay with the Chargers. If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well.

The full quote is comparing the Bears tearing down the roster with the Chaegers keeping Bosa and Mack. So my comment was not about Bosa and Mack being a reason for Harbaugh's success. My comment was saying keeping them obviously meant that Harbaugh was teyif to compete year one as juxtaposed with Poles and Flus not really trying to compete year one as they traded Mack, Quinn and Quan.

In future when a paragraph starts with "By contrast," it means that paragraph us being contrasted with the precedijg paragraph.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

The full quote is comparing the Bears tearing down the roster with the Chaegers keeping Bosa and Mack. So my comment was not about Bosa and Mack being a reason for Harbaugh's success.

"If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well."

What on earth are you talking about....again?

And what roster did the Bears tear down in 2024?

 

[remydat]

"If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well."

What on earth are you talking about....again?

And what roster did the Bears tear down in 2024?

Read the 2 paragraphs together and look up what by contrast means.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

Read the 2 paragraphs together and look up what by contrast means.

I know what contrast means. And what roster did the Bears tear down in 2024?

"If instead the Chargers GM had traded them I certainly would not expect Harbaugh to do as well."

Not sure how 2022 is relevant in 2024, especially with your Tabula Rasa argument history.