UN arms treaty could put U.S. gun owners in foreign sights

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Yeah, yeah yeah, I know......"where did the story come from" and all that......but here you go: Here is what some of your representatives are up to.



Today begins the most important 26-day period for our Second Amendment freedoms in recent history.

That’s because today, representatives from many of the world’s socialist, tyrannical and dictatorial regimes will gather at United Nations headquarters in New York for a month-long meeting, in which they’ll put the finishing touches on an international Arms Trade Treaty that could seriously restrict your freedom to own, purchase and carry a firearm.

Specifically, the U.N. wants to implement international gun registration requirements, bans on commonly owned firearms, tracking and registration of ammunition purchases, and create a new U.N. gun control bureaucracy.

You might think that something so obviously menacing to one of our enumerated fundamental rights would receive a strong rebuke from our top government leaders. But you’d be wrong. This is President Barack Obama’s vision for America, and we’re expected to just go along with it.

In fact, a group of anti-gun members of the U.S. House of Representatives, led by U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), went so far as to circulate a letter last week to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, in which they “strongly urge the United States to take a leadership role in pushing for a strong, verifiable Arms Trade Treaty.”

These House members insist that the treaty include “controls on a comprehensive list of weaponry, including small arms and light weapons,” as well as controls on ammunition. For good measure, they wrap their unconstitutional demands in the mantle of advancing “human rights” and preventing international violence.



Since when did it become fashionable for sitting members of Congress to lobby international thugs, tyrants and dictators against our own U.S. Constitution?

Rep. Grijalva should consider the plight of good people in countries like the Sudan, where it’s virtually impossible for an average citizen to legally own a firearm for self-defense.

He, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton should open their eyes to the unspeakable human rights atrocities that exist in their gun-ban utopia. They ought to see how far their gun-confiscation agenda resonates with hundreds of thousands of defenseless Sudanese men, women and children who live in constant fear of being beaten, raped, sold into slavery or murdered.

It’s easy for Congressmen Raul Grijalva, James McGovern, Bobby Rush, Dennis Kucinich and every other signer of this woefully ignorant letter to sit on high — surrounded by the secure walls of freedom built by our strong Second Amendment rights — and dictate to oppressed citizens in other parts of the world that their lives would be better if they only had less freedom than we do in the United States.

Thankfully, these clueless representatives don’t speak for the majority of us. The NRA has been warning Americans about this ticking time bomb at the U.N. for over 15 years. Now it’s zero hour. Wayne LaPierre and I will be at U.N. headquarters in New York this week, fighting tooth and nail to protect the same constitution that Raul Grijalva and his pals swore an oath to uphold and defend.

And I can promise you, we won’t stop fighting until our Second Amendment freedoms are safe from this international disgrace.


Chris W. Cox is the Executive Director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) and serves as the organization’s chief lobbyist.
 

ytsejam

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 31, 2010
Posts:
7,157
Liked Posts:
4,171
Uh, this is about international arms trade.

This is just conspiracy theory, new world order nut bullshit.

The NRA jumps on board to scare people into donating.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Uh, this is about international arms trade.

This is just conspiracy theory, new world order nut bullshit.

The NRA jumps on board to scare people into donating.



Yup.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Ok, so you are saying that none of the guns currently available in the good ol' USA are manufactured i.e. TRADED worldwide?
 

IceHogsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,024
Liked Posts:
0
Uh, this is about international arms trade.

This is just conspiracy theory, new world order nut bullshit.

The NRA jumps on board to scare people into donating.



Again, your opinion and not facts. Jax is providing facts, in fact specific names of those concerned.



I can assume you can care less about owning a gun and maybe you do not like others who do own a gun but if the NRA is worried then so am I and I am not even a member of the NRA. In fact in some regards I do not agree with them like their stance on allowing fully automatic weapons. With this being said if ammunition becomes limited and tracked along with sales of ammunition and handguns then I am worried as well.



I would love to see the numbers of gun sales and the increase since Obama came into office. Anyone? I have heard it is quite remarkable.



I do not doubt for a second that Obama and his cronies would love to stop gun sales for the public. Hell, Obama resided in Chicago and supported their whacko gun laws that were struck down by the Supreme Court.
 

ytsejam

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 31, 2010
Posts:
7,157
Liked Posts:
4,171
I am gun owner. You only make an ass of yourself when you assume, contrary to popular word play.

My post is only opinion, but an op ed from the NRILA is fact?

What anti gun measures have been enacted under the Obama admin?

Gun sales going up proves what exactly?

A bunch of paranoid gun nuts see the future or are they just paranoid gun nuts?

Do you really believe the conspiracy theory bullshit about fast & furious or do you just WANT to?

Did Obama start off this master plan of gunwalking back in 2006?

Oh, that was the past. Obama's fault, got it. He should have fixed it by 1-21-09 at the latest on the 1% chance it was Clinton's fault.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Just because factcheck.org is a liberal leaning site doesn't mean I discount everything they say (as I stated earlier). However, those of you who think Obama isn't "Anti-gun" must not be paying attention to his history. Also, the way they lay out the "facts" in the article on factcheck are the same sarcastic, laughable logic: "Do you really think Obama is going to go after all the guns in the country even though he said he wouldn't?" is not a fact. It is a guess. I prefer to guess on the side of caution.
 

ytsejam

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 31, 2010
Posts:
7,157
Liked Posts:
4,171
Regardless of factcheck, Dick Morris is a republican hack who constantly whores for donations to his PAC on Fox News. A former aide to the Clintons that has a stick up his ass and has done nothing but bash them and suck hookers' toes since.



Jax, I support your 2nd amendment rights, man!

I am generally in favor of CCW laws, with reasonable limitations of course.

I am on YOUR SIDE!

Can't you see that this is just more scaremongering bullshit?

The NRA? Dick Morris? Can anyone present anyone without a right wing biased point of view that is expressing any VALID concerns over this?



http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Majesty, I know you support the 2nd Amendment. I am more inclined to believe someone who was at one time very close to the Clintons than a couple websites that really have no more "fact" to base something upon except to say the idea is outlandish or preposterous. However, I do understand that a treaty does not supercede our Constitution. With that said, I will continue to monitor (something the lamestream media isn't) the situation because I simply don't trust the man in charge. He has proven time and time again that he will do whatever he wants, whether or not it is legal according to The United States Constitution.
 

bri

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
4,797
Liked Posts:
1
Jax, he doesn't like it when you call him that. You should call him Jam like the rest of us do.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
Really? Jam? I haven't seen that one before. I told him I type majesty because it is an easy word for me to type.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
Tin foil hat wearing mfers....



I own a gun and I still think our current interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is WRONG.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
My foil is aluminum, thank you very much.
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
[font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]"thay r [NOT] gunna git mah gunz!"[/font]

placental_insufficiency.jpg
 

winos5

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 19, 2013
Posts:
7,956
Liked Posts:
829
Location:
Wish You Were Here
NSFW.



Not cool man
 

Top