Was Kane Party Thread, Now Turned To Bolland For Selke Debates.

Status
Not open for further replies.

GrinderBall41

Sox/B'Hawks/Bears/Purdue
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
666
Liked Posts:
166
Location:
NW Indiana
IDK why anybody even bothers arguing on this site. Obviously every player who doesn't put up 90 points a year absolutely sucks. Everyone who sees value in a role player is an idiot. And every GM who signs one of these players should be fired. /CCS Hawks Forum
 

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
That's just it. I'm not likely to give Bolland the Selke because he's a good defensive forward.

I'm more willing to give it to a two way player, like Toews or Hossa.


That's not saying Bolland is bad at defense (he's not, he's very good perhaps elite) I'm just saying that dismissing players for the Selke because they have two roles on a team is a little silly to me, especially when there is a player on the Blackhawks who is asked to score and shutdown. Toews is a good scorer and a good defender. I'm willing to reward the guy on two ends over one.

:bro:

Not really sure how that goes against what I said. But good call on what you said other than the fact that now you're leaving out the players that are just good on defense.

The Selke is supposed to be for the best defensive forward, but it usually turns out to not exactly reward what it says that it does anymore. Usually it's the best two-way forward now.

IDK why anybody even bothers arguing on this site. Obviously every player who doesn't put up 90 points a year absolutely sucks. Everyone who sees value in a role player is an idiot. And every GM who signs one of these players should be fired. /CCS Hawks Forum

You just explained the entire forum in a paragraph.
You deserve some kind of trophy for that.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
IDK why anybody even bothers arguing on this site. Obviously every player who doesn't put up 90 points a year absolutely sucks. Everyone who sees value in a role player is an idiot. And every GM who signs one of these players should be fired. /CCS Hawks Forum

:rolleyes: maybe true, but at the same time it shouldnt be the opposite either like bolland for selke.

anyway...This thread is now way off the tracks. creating 2 new threads so people can still talk about bolland and the selke and kane off the ice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top