Week 4 IGT: Chicago Bears (0-3) vs Oakland Raiders (2-1) 12:00PM CDT CBS

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    33

xer0h0ur

HS Referee HoF
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
22,260
Liked Posts:
17,856
Location:
Chicago, IL.
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Cutler is better than Clausen. I'll give you that. There is a reason why he has been to the playoffs once. Way too inconsistent.

And let me guess, when he did make the playoffs it wasn't the offense at all. It was because of the defense. Cutler haters have just as Special person excuses as Cutler nuthuggers. The whole "team sport" aspect to football seems foreign apparently. People would rather blame one guy and call it a day.
 

FrankieLyrical

South Side Chicagoan
Joined:
Nov 5, 2012
Posts:
2,483
Liked Posts:
802
Location:
Chicago, IL.
Assuming that you're both white, or non-black, let's meet in Englewood. We'll all know who were are. 57th and Ashland, let's do it
 

The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2014
Posts:
18,007
Liked Posts:
3,238
Location:
Southern California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
REALLY? Did he fumble a snap right in his hands from the center? Did he throw a red zone interception off his back foot? Cutler, overall played a nice game. Stupid FanBoi bullshit has no logical place here.

Forte hardly ever fumbles. He got a hard helmet hit on the hand carrying the ball. Doubt many ball carriers would have held onto that ball. There were quite a few bad snaps that Cutler had to corral in. Does anyone know why they moved Slauson to center and not Grasu? Grasu is a center, correct?
 

Leon Sandcastle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Feb 5, 2013
Posts:
4,405
Liked Posts:
3,592
Forte hardly ever fumbles. He got a hard helmet hit on the hand carrying the ball. Doubt many ball carriers would have held onto that ball. There were quite a few bad snaps that Cutler had to corral in. Does anyone know why they moved Slauson to center and not Grasu? Grasu is a center, correct?

He was inactive
 

Newblood

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
10,360
Liked Posts:
7,075
Location:
S.L.Ut
Forte hardly ever fumbles. He got a hard helmet hit on the hand carrying the ball. Doubt many ball carriers would have held onto that ball. There were quite a few bad snaps that Cutler had to corral in. Does anyone know why they moved Slauson to center and not Grasu? Grasu is a center, correct?

Would you say that gravity played a large part in the Forte fumble?
 

Broc

well baked
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,575
Liked Posts:
9,659
You're a real piece of work. let me guess 911 didn't happen in world? People like you are the reason people like Hitler can come to power and wreak havoc across the planet.

LOL! Please don't tell me you're one of those fools that actually still believes the official 9/11 story...

Tell me again how many of the 19 hijackers were Iraqi or Afghani? Oh wait, none where. 15 Saudis, 2 from UAE, 1 from Lebanon, and one from Egypt.

So obviously the next logical step was to start a pointless quagmire in Afghanistan and invade Iraq because Saddam has WMDs... :bizarro: makes perfect sense... :bizarro:

Never mind the fact that our own intelligence agencies have testified to the fact that they knew what these assholes were up to..

Never mind the fact that the flight instructor that tested Hani Hanjour stated that he trouble controlling and landing the single-engine Cessna 172 but yet he was somehow able to perform a complex aerial decent maneuver in a 757 that would be difficult for even a fighter jet to pull off....

I could go on for days with the bullshit surrounding 9/11.

If you still buy the official 9/11 story and believe we went to war because they hate our freedom and we needed to protect us poor civilians from imminent threat to our freedom, I've got some beach front property in Nebraska I'd love to sell you. They dragged us into that mess for the same reason as always, geopolitics, resources (oil, minerals, heroin) and so Cheney and his Halliburton buddies could profit billions working clean up. At the very least our government knew about it and allowed it to happen, at the very worst people like Cheney were directly involved in letting it happen (i.e - standing down air defense and allowing a plane [probably actually a drone or missile] hit the pentagon).
 

inchibearfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 19, 2013
Posts:
6,030
Liked Posts:
1,972
Uhm I don't agree to disagree. So if a receiver has burned his man, and is wide open down the field by yards, and the QB fucks up the throw and misses him, or grossly under throws him, it was a bad decision? I'd call it a bad throw. The throws to Bennett, that were picked off by Matthews and Woodson respectively, were bad throws as well. But had they been better, they would have been huge plays. Good decision, bad throw. Both did not have the velocity they needed, one had bad placement as well (Matthews pick)

That's what I have to say is an improvement this year. He isn't making bad decisions, e.g., throws to Marshall into double/triple coverage. The ints this year have been bad throws or communication errors. I don't know what caused the under throw today (injury/back foot), but he just didn't put enough zip on it. There are 3 qbs in this league that throw very few ints and all of them are over 30. I can live with bad throws as long as the int wasn't due to a bad decision. I think Gase has some to do with this with them getting to the line with 15+ seconds on the playclock so Cutler has time to read the defense.
 

Sculpt

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,785
Liked Posts:
3,027
Would you say that gravity played a large part in the Forte fumble?



its+a+small+world+after+all.jpg
 

theOHIOSTATE!

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 9, 2014
Posts:
3,591
Liked Posts:
1,219
Location:
ND is horrible.
Uhm I don't agree to disagree. So if a receiver has burned his man, and is wide open down the field by yards, and the QB fucks up the throw and misses him, or grossly under throws him, it was a bad decision? I'd call it a bad throw. The throws to Bennett, that were picked off by Matthews and Woodson respectively, were bad throws as well. But had they been better, they would have been huge plays. Good decision, bad throw. Both did not have the velocity they needed, one had bad placement as well (Matthews pick)

Uh what?

I don't think you're reading what i'm writing....If you CAN'T plant your feet, and in this case given how the play unfolded it didn't seem to me to seem like he could plant normally, you should either throw it away or choose a closer target.

That's all I am saying....he should have known they were in decent position to make it very difficult on Oak. to win the game without the completion and not delivered the ball in a marginal spot mechanically. I can't break it down for you any easier, or we just are agreeing to disagree on whether he could have set up the pass better with his feet. I haven't watched a replay or anything; just relaying my impressions of the play.

Of course it was a bad pass, that has nothing to do with my point, but I suppose that gets thanks on here, lol.
 

ursamajor

D.J. Moore is phat
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,168
Liked Posts:
3,991
Location:
HHM’s Head
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Uh what?

I don't think you're reading what i'm writing....If you CAN'T plant your feet, and in this case given how the play unfolded it didn't seem to me to seem like he could plant normally, you should either throw it away or choose a closer target.

That's all I am saying....he should have known they were in decent position to make it very difficult on Oak. to win the game without the completion and not delivered the ball in a marginal spot mechanically. I can't break it down for you any easier, or we just are agreeing to disagree on whether he could have set up the pass better with his feet. I haven't watched a replay or anything; just relaying my impressions of the play.

Of course it was a bad pass, that has nothing to do with my point, but I suppose that gets thanks on here, lol.
Both ints he could have planted and driven. On today's pic, he could have put more on it regardless of his feet however.

It was a bad throw. The decision on where the ball should have gone was correct though.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 

theOHIOSTATE!

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 9, 2014
Posts:
3,591
Liked Posts:
1,219
Location:
ND is horrible.
Both ints he could have planted and driven. On today's pic, he could have put more on it regardless of his feet however.

It was a bad throw. The decision on where the ball should have gone was correct though.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Im not sure why people keep stating he went to the right guy when no one is stating anything to the contrary......

I don't think given how the play progressed he was in a great position to set up for the pass, I could definitely be wrong.

Like I said, agreeing to disagree.

I have no issue with him targeting a open guy downfield there.
 
Top