Forgot how morally grey and depressing Witcher could be. Played the quest where a fellow Witcher was higher to kill a Leshen and then the villagers tried to stiff him on payment offering just 12 crowns when they had agreed to over a 100. They then lure him to a barn where they claim the gold is and then try to murder him. He loses his temper and kills the entire village save for one girl that reminded him of his sister.
So I was torn regarding this decision. On one hand a lot of the villagers were in on the plan to stiff and then try to murder him not to mention Witchers risk their lives yet people generally shit on them. On other hand, he most likely could have diffused the situation without kill all the villagers.
In the end, he owned up to the fact he lost his temper. Witchers are suppose to be neutral and as a Witcher who almost died when a village turned on me hence the title Butcher of Blaviken, I decided to spare him. Reminds me of my favorite quite from the books and game that sum up Geralt's character nicely.
“Evil is Evil. Lesser, greater, middling… Makes no difference. The degree is arbitary. The definition’s blurred. If I’m to choose between one evil and another… I’d rather not choose at all.”