The ONE season excuse is getting old. Actually, it's old already.
He's the #2 overall pick. He's shown no flashes of being an elite player. He couldn't beat Marquise Williams out at North Carolina to get on the field. I don't understand how some of you football fans can be so dumb and not see what is so plainly obvious. Elite players don't miss wide open guys on a consistent basis. I suppose Trubitchsky supporters are the same guys that kept on suppoting Cutler.
What an insanely idiotic and simplistic rebuttal. Your reply has all the makings of a toddler throwing a tantrum. You provided a false equivalency between Trubisky and Cutler and even threw in a "Trubitchky" just the check the name calling box to make this a tantrum reply.
Yes, he's had ONE relevant season as the starting quarterback for an organization that can't get the quarterback position figured out individually or systemically. There is no culture of winning quarterbacks in Chicago, nor is there a system that makes sense to develop a young quarterback with the pressure of being the savior right away.
That one season is his rookie campaign for all intents and purposes. If you're gonna count those 12 games under Fox, then you really are clueless.
Look at the early career for Peyton Manning. Look at all the open throws that even Aaron Rodgers missed during the Mike McCarthy fiasco that ultimately lead to him being fired. Being in an offense that allows constant pressure and no running threat is enough to effect a young quarterbacks play on the field. This is the case with any job in the world.
- NFL QB with crap system and personel,
- Racer in a Dodge Neon
- IT guy with crap systems working for a company that cares more about cutting costs
- (Insert any other job in the world here)
ANY job in the world will effect the person doing said job if they are setup for failure organizationally.
If you want emperical evidence of this, just look at the last 60 years of Bears football and let us know what you come up with for how well the quarterback carousel has worked for installing that change in offensive production and philosophy. I'd say 60 years is a large enough sample size to see that evidence for an intelligent fan of the game.
Compare those findings to the Packers, Colts, or any other team that always seems to get "lucky" enough to strike gold at quarterback.
This is also how the Bears always seem to figure out how to build an elite defense.
It's not good luck vs bad luck. It's one team having invested in that philosophy long term and the other knee jerk getting rid of what they have to start over every few years all the while the meathead fans call for crucifying the person inserted into this role setup for failure and screaming about how there's never someone to learn behind.
How do you not get how idiotic this is?