- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
go get Nabby. but it won't save this team so whatever.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
nabby plus some d help would
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
I think I gotta go with a player like nabby. it took a couple days to think, but I just dont see a cup with emery or crawford.
southern_cross_116
New member
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,748
- Liked Posts:
- 1,012
- Location:
- Australia
Or change the rules so that the other team only scores if they can hit the posts (that or just use a shooting screen) -it probably would have a better save percentage.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
crawfords is at .898....thats pretty fucking bad
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
they both suck..end of story.
southern_cross_116
New member
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,748
- Liked Posts:
- 1,012
- Location:
- Australia
Yeah and I have seen some games lately where -forget who- was at like .741% -so it might be .898 now but what will it be next game?
Flip the net down then -and make the other team have to lift the puck to not hit the pipes to have it count as a goal.... anything :woot:
:thinking:
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
i really really want tblow in net! please q!
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
Emery was solid in net tonight
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
its one game. again, we are looking to win the cup....not get by and try to make the playoffs if we are lucky.emery isnt the ansewer and neither is crawford.
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
and loses again. see what happens when he's not feasting on shit teams.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
.899 sv% for emery
.898 sv% for crawford
both blow. there is no defending this.
also, 2 of emerys goals should have NEVER happened.
.898 sv% for crawford
both blow. there is no defending this.
also, 2 of emerys goals should have NEVER happened.
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,905
- Liked Posts:
- 1,974
Give Salak a shot? I do not want to give up any assets for Nik. Send someone down/waive a useless player to bring him up for a couple of games.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
I dont think that is the ansewer either. I dunno what think anymore, even if emery plays well and gets to a respectable sv% I dont trust him in the playoffs. There is a reason he was a "tryout" and didnt latch on with someone else that needed a goalie.
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,905
- Liked Posts:
- 1,974
That's the point - he'd be an unknown commodity. Might be worth a shot.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
I see your point.
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,905
- Liked Posts:
- 1,974
Probably a dumb point by me, but it might save worthwhile assets.
southern_cross_116
New member
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,748
- Liked Posts:
- 1,012
- Location:
- Australia
Not a dumb point at all - - it ends up becoming a 'why not' situation. It can't really get any worse.
Otoh, someone could have one of those ambiguous upper/lower body injuries and have to be IR'd.
Otoh, someone could have one of those ambiguous upper/lower body injuries and have to be IR'd.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
yes, those mystery injuries! crawford should get one!
Laxdman27
New member
- Joined:
- Feb 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 1
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Which one???
That's the toughest question!! Both boys are good in net. It makes it tough for any goalie to see the puck when your D is out of position. They've been giving up them clean up goals or just hard rippers topside of the points. Granted if we had an outstanding goalie (ie. Quick, Lindquist and others) many of those easy topside goals might be saved due to the puck awareness of a top notch pipper. Having 2 just above average goalies makes it difficult expecially now with a 9 game lossing streak. Who's to blame, everyone!! This is the toughest stretch for the boys! Constant support from fans is going to be the only thing it seams. Faith in their once strong play to return. There is a spark in every game but it gets dampened and they can't light that damn lamp, and it all deters them from strong consistency. One of our two net minders needs to find the spark and light the fire under the butts of the gents in front of him!!
That's the toughest question!! Both boys are good in net. It makes it tough for any goalie to see the puck when your D is out of position. They've been giving up them clean up goals or just hard rippers topside of the points. Granted if we had an outstanding goalie (ie. Quick, Lindquist and others) many of those easy topside goals might be saved due to the puck awareness of a top notch pipper. Having 2 just above average goalies makes it difficult expecially now with a 9 game lossing streak. Who's to blame, everyone!! This is the toughest stretch for the boys! Constant support from fans is going to be the only thing it seams. Faith in their once strong play to return. There is a spark in every game but it gets dampened and they can't light that damn lamp, and it all deters them from strong consistency. One of our two net minders needs to find the spark and light the fire under the butts of the gents in front of him!!