DanTown
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2009
- Posts:
- 2,446
- Liked Posts:
- 509
You are missing the point. Hall of Fame is about immortalizing your time spent as a baseball player.
Anyone can get info on any player but there will always be a nitch for the players that were voted in.
Now arguing the value of sportswriters opinions is a whole another subject. My opinion is the members alive should be the ones casting the vote. Those writers have never been on the field with these guys and honestly have no right to sort them. Any player has access to stats info but the players know what it takes to play at that level.
The point of the HOF is to record the history of baseball. To argue Barry Bonds doesn't belong in the HOF is literally impossible. But to say Bonds doesn't deserve a place in the hall but that the greenies users of the 60s/70s do is a little rich for me. People want to remember Bonds for the end of his career where he was a steriod user that's fine but that's like a third of his career. Here are his career numbers through 1998 and before any steroid use was even suspected
411 HR
445 SB
.290/.411/.556
164 OPS+
3 MVP
8 GG
7 Silver Slugger