abegibronlives
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 28, 2019
- Posts:
- 1,354
- Liked Posts:
- 940
You're right and I think he excels for all to see.
I hope so.
Cautiously optimistic.
You're right and I think he excels for all to see.
Yes. Also, close to a .500 win record.Fields finished last year with 2,242 passing yards, 17 passing TDs and 12 INTs.
He had a 60% completion percentage, and an 85 passer rating.
Let’s say he made a big jump passing and went something like:
3,200+ passing yards
24 passing TDs
12 INTs
67% completion percentage
95+ passer rating
I realize that’s not the ceiling we all hope for, but that would be quite the jump. If he did that this year, would it convince you he’s the guy?
my point is Fields can throw for 4500+ with 30+ TD's and it wont matter if the Bears have a losing record.
Again, if the Bears are 5-12 it won't mean much because his critics will only focus on him not doing enough in the passing game and his cheerleaders are going to point to the defense.
Fields finished last year with 2,242 passing yards, 17 passing TDs and 12 INTs.
He had a 60% completion percentage, and an 85 passer rating.
Let’s say he made a big jump passing and went something like:
3,200+ passing yards
24 passing TDs
12 INTs
67% completion percentage
95+ passer rating
I realize that’s not the ceiling we all hope for, but that would be quite the jump. If he did that this year, would it convince you he’s the guy?
So I’d like to apologize to you. In the beginning I definitely thought you didn’t like Fields but I realized you were judging him fairly. I should have never compared you with c*nts like Daniel hereImagine being this guy ^^^^.
Rare PIB LSo I’d like to apologize to you. In the beginning I definitely thought you didn’t like Fields but I realized you were judging him fairly. I should have never compared you with c*nuts like Daniel here
Just so we're clear i meant you apologizing to the Fields hater @PrideisBears and not that your original take was wrong.Rare PIB L
No issues but I don’t think baba hates fields. I mean I hope has more common sense and knows Fields will be a top ten QBJust so we're clear i meant you apologizing to the Fields hater @PrideisBears and not that your original take was wrong.
THE #1 FIELDS HATERNo issues but I don’t think baba hates fields. I mean I hope has more common sense and knows Fields will be a top ten QB
100% on board and can’t wait to see Fields this season.So I’d like to apologize to you. In the beginning I definitely thought you didn’t like Fields but I realized you were judging him fairly. I should have never compared you with c*nts like Daniel here
Trubisky was good enough to earn a pro-bowl spot that year though thanks to the team winning a whole bunch of games. It was a good season from him, no doubt. That wasn't so much the problem as the following years were, where he couldn't improve on his shortcomings which led to him and Nagy getting exposed.The scary thing is that those numbers would be a huge improvement, despite being the exact same passing numbers Mitch Trubisky put up in his first full year in the NFL.
3,223 passing yards
24 TDs
12 INTs
67% completion percentage
95.4 passer rating
Mitchell Trubisky Stats, Height, Weight, Position, Draft, College | Pro-Football-Reference.com
Checkout the latest stats for Mitchell Trubisky. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, college, draft, and more on Pro-football-reference.com.www.pro-football-reference.com
I believe in Fields, but I think caution is in order. A lot of people are predicting some massive season and the playoffs based on damn near nothing. It’s much more likely Fields makes incremental improvement and the Bears still suck. I’d love to be wrong, though.
Throw in 500 rushing yards and we'll say 5-6 rushing TDs (probably more, be we can be conservative) and it wouldn't be the worst year statistically speaking.Fields finished last year with 2,242 passing yards, 17 passing TDs and 12 INTs.
He had a 60% completion percentage, and an 85 passer rating.
Let’s say he made a big jump passing and went something like:
3,200+ passing yards
24 passing TDs
12 INTs
67% completion percentage
95+ passer rating
I realize that’s not the ceiling we all hope for, but that would be quite the jump. If he did that this year, would it convince you he’s the guy?
Well, speaking for stats, the yards and completion percentage presumed are right where Lamar Jackson was in 2019 in 15 games (and I think that we should not presume fully healthy seasons for QBs that make plays on the ground). I am not expecting 2019 Lamar results, however, I just want to keep in mind what success may look like for such a dynamic runner learning to be a dynamic passer.Throw in 500 rushing yards and we'll say 5-6 rushing TDs (probably more, be we can be conservative) and it wouldn't be the worst year statistically speaking.
Less about the numbers though for me. Last season, Fields has a pretty incredible 6 game stretch - would like to see that more consistently. Quicker reads, better game management i.e. understanding down/distance situations like not throwing it 40 yards down field to Mooney on a go route when its 3rd and 4. Better redzone execution. He had some shit talent last year and plenty of examples of WRs dropping balls in the endzone so not completely on him.
If the OL can be more consistent, I think we will see all of these improvements. That was one of his issues last year, some plays the protection was adequate and some plays he had 3 guys on him as soon as he touched the ball so feel like he was always in fight or flight mode and had a hard time getting into a rhythm.
Trubisky was good enough to earn a pro-bowl spot that year though thanks to the team winning a whole bunch of games. It was a good season from him, no doubt. That wasn't so much the problem as the following years were, where he couldn't improve on his shortcomings which led to him and Nagy getting exposed.
And I don't think it's based on damn near nothing. Trubisky also had a lot more to work with that season compared to Fields this last season. Fields also has unique home-run hitting ability with both his legs and his arm, something Mitch didn't have to be able to lean on while trying to become a good passer to all levels of the field. Fields already has a track record of elevating a bad offense to performances greater than the sum of it's parts while Mitch was always the (or at least a) limiting factor for the offense.
So screw you and your calls for caution! I'm throwing caution to the wind! :goes streaking:
Not wrong but it was still a good season and a reason for optimism that he could build on what he had done. The context of the thread is judge a stat line in concert with the team's ability to win.Let's put Trubisky's "Pro Bowl" season into perspective....he wasn't a pro bowl selection, he was an alternate replacing Goff. He had the lowest yardage total and was easily the weakest QB of all the QB's selected. And for those that want to say "he still made the Pro Bowl, that should mean something"...let me remind you that this past year Tyler Huntley was a pro bowl alternate with the monster stats of 658 yards, 3 total TD's, and 3 Int's. A pro bowl alternate holds about as much weight as Trump Bucks do in our economy.
For me, it’s just his reaction time.
I would like to piggyback here and combine his release/throwing motion with picking the right throw at the right time.For me, it's justin's release. As a neutral, non kool aid, rose colored glasses chicago bears qb backer. When it comes to throwing mechanics and quick release, the difference between Caleb Williams and Justin is night and day.
Fields throwing motion is locked at 30fps and drops to 15fps when the weather reaches <35F. Probably explains why Justin hesitates to throw on some plays cause the defense gets a split second jump telegraphing his slo mo windup.
Wonder which team will legit tank this year and grab Caleb on a rookie deal . . .
"while it's great having the #1 overall, it's just as important getting the #1 overall in the right year" Kyle Davidson, GM of blackhawks