Britbuffguy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 29, 2017
- Posts:
- 6,027
- Liked Posts:
- 4,497
- Location:
- Madison, WI
Jackson is an easy choice. He hasn't made a good play since he picked off Rodgers in the 2nd Green Bay game to secure their last win vs the Packers, and hurting himself in the process.If we were to assume cutting Fuller or Jackson was approximately the same in 'dead cap savings', which would you have rather cut?
I think Fuller is more valuable to winning in the next year or two than Jackson, based on last year's performances.
I'm not an expert at determining 'dead cap', but looking at spotrac.com, cutting Eddie Jackson is $18.6mil, where I believe I read Fuller was $20mil with Bears saving a mere $11mil. I would have suggested Pace find someway to keep Fuller (and Jackson) but he didn't. The rest of Jackson's contract might be attractive if he plays as he did in years prior to 2020, but have my doubts that will happen. So the choice between the two is interesting.
At least Fuller would show up here and there, Eddie has been a ghost since then.