Bust
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 5, 2020
- Posts:
- 9,549
- Liked Posts:
- 4,298
If we were to assume cutting Fuller or Jackson was approximately the same in 'dead cap savings', which would you have rather cut?
I think Fuller is more valuable to winning in the next year or two than Jackson, based on last year's performances.
I'm not an expert at determining 'dead cap', but looking at spotrac.com, cutting Eddie Jackson is $18.6mil, where I believe I read Fuller was $20mil with Bears saving a mere $11mil. I would have suggested Pace find someway to keep Fuller (and Jackson) but he didn't. The rest of Jackson's contract might be attractive if he plays as he did in years prior to 2020, but have my doubts that will happen. So the choice between the two is interesting.
It was Robert Quinn's fault