beckdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,750
- Liked Posts:
- 3,741
It takes a certain kind of GM to give a 32 year old pitcher a six year deal and Andrew Friedman and the Dodger group doesn't seem like they're that kind of team. They wouldn't go six on Grienke, not sure why they'd go six on Arrieta.
I get that but i'd also suggest that you're already paying Kershaw big time money and have one of the better farm systems in baseball(probably the best). Kershaw's 28 and they've yet to break through championship wise. You can't really let him go many more years without making another big push given how great he is. If for example you got say 3 years like the past 2 from Arreita out of a 6-7 year deal from 32-35, you'd have a good shot at being what the dback were with Johnson/Schilling. I'd also say that while in general you shouldn't trust older pitchers, Arreita's game does lend itself to aging well. He's been a high 50's ground ball rate and while he throws 94 it's not like dropping that down say 3 mph would kill him. He'd be less effective sure but a less effective Arrieta is still better than a lot of pitchers.
Ultimately that might be the reason the cubs keep him and all this is posturing. I'm just saying if he goes anywhere, LA makes more sense to me than the Yankees because who do they even have that would be top end talent after they clear their books? Sure they could in theory throw a godfather contract at Harper but if you do that then do the same to Arrieta what else is there? Their farm system isn't any where near as good as LA's and LA's prospects are closer to the majors or are already there.