- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 20,423
- Liked Posts:
- 14,314
- Location:
- The sewers
My favorite teams
Well, you keep using some of the best players EVER as your examples......... say no more, but yes, more minutes does add up. Older year games were also slower, and more physical. Today's game is a lot more running, imo, and players do need rest.
Thib's also has a bad habit of playing players in long stretches in a game. He also sits them for long stretches, which is bad, imo. He'll play a player a full quarter, and then sit him for the next, only to play that same player for the entire next quarter. This is bad.
I used to hate sitting out too long when I played. After sweating so much, you actually get cold if you sit too long. That's why you see players put on sweat jackets. I'd much rather see a player get small bursts of play regular through the entire game, rather than long on/off stretches, imo.
This can actually promote injuries. It's similar to your diet, it's much better to eat many small meals in the day, then to eat a couple big meals.
so you say you hate sitting but then your main argument is that you think players should be rested more today? I know you mentioned it as you didn't like sitting for long, but then what do you propose? a bunch of 2 minute rests as opposed to 2 rests of 7 minutes a piece? that wouldn't help players get into a flow on the court.
and of course im talking about the best players when it comes to players who played big time minutes. you think teams are going to play their scrubs 38 min a game?? heck no...the guys that play those kind of big minutes are always going to be the best players on their teams :shrug: the fact remains that minutes didn't effect those guys and these guys today are supposedly "better athletes," yet they cant play 38 min a game? I don't buy that for a second