fatbeard
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 25, 2013
- Posts:
- 13,193
- Liked Posts:
- 11,018
84 pitches through two innings? Maybe the Reds would be interested in him.Yeah, plus he threw 84 pitches in two innings. I'm not sure I've ever seen that before.
84 pitches through two innings? Maybe the Reds would be interested in him.Yeah, plus he threw 84 pitches in two innings. I'm not sure I've ever seen that before.
Unlike Lackey, Shields hasn't adjusted to aging yet.
Unlike Lackey, Shields hasn't adjusted to aging yet.
Man, getting James Shields for three years is the best baseball move ever.
My theory on why he's fallen off: he doesn't have the same stuff to attack the zone like he used to so now he's trying to be too fine. That's why he has so many walks and home runs: because he has to pitch out of the zone and when he does come into the zone, it's in obvious situations and is his "less than good" stuff is meatball city
.287/.456/.471 when Shields is behind the batter
.337/.333/.564 when Shields is even
.152/.164/.212 when Shields is ahead
Absolutely right and that was starting to become obvious last year. You talk about sometimes great moves being the ones you don't make? I am very glad that Shields turned down the Cubs offer before last season. When good starting pitchers lose their stuff it usually goes one of two ways. Either they struggle for a while and figure out how to locate their best pitches better becoming a good MOR starter in the process or they just can't just can't adjust and fall off quickly. To me Shields was always a bit overrated, although he was a solid starter, and now it's going to be difficult for him to get the numbers back. His best FIP in a season was as a Ray in 2011 at 3.42 and it's really hard to see him ever getting close to that but if he can get under 4.0 he would be an asset. I get why the White Sox made the trade, I likely would have done the same thing at the price, but there are no guarantees.
That just means throw strikes. No need to be fine. Just attack the lower half of the plate and come up only to induce pop ups.
Or he can develop a change like Trevor Hoffman had and get by with it.
That's why I not big on Andrew Miller. Listen to a Yanks game and they really want Baez, schwarber, plus a spec. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's why I not big on Andrew Miller. Listen to a Yanks game and they really want Baez, schwarber, plus a spec. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They apparently have Andrew Miller confused with Clayton Kershaw.
For real. Schwarber is a MLB starter when healthy. Baez would start on most teams. Yanks are dumb to think that trade has merit.
I doubt its actually Cashman asking for those playersFor real. Schwarber is a MLB starter when healthy. Baez would start on most teams. Yanks are dumb to think that trade has merit.
That's why I not big on Andrew Miller. Listen to a Yanks game and they really want Baez, schwarber, plus a spec. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk