jooo83
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,901
- Liked Posts:
- 1,374
My favorite teams
Do people really consider Bote a viable starting infield option? If so, why
Do people really consider Bote a viable starting infield option? If so, why
That's not how arbitration really works though. If they offer him 80% and lose he gets whatever his side submitted and then the only way you get rid of that money is to trade him. In other words, they can't non-tender him now and save money if arbitration doesn't go their way. They are still on the hook.But a everyday line up with the current players:
Bote 2B
Schwarber LF
Bryant 3B
Rizzo 1B
Baez SS
Happ CF
Contreras C
Heyward RF
Bench
Descalso UI
Caratini C
Short UI (emergency SS/26 man)
Kemp IF/OF
Almora OF
Now Cots has them at 2 mil over tax and that IMO could be addressed in Arb dealings. They are going by the Estimated pay out. Almora they are predicting 1.7M and I would offer .8 for his value. He stands firm at 1.7 I would pull the offer. And go with a cheaper 4th OF.
Think you need to state your intent for 2019. Is he viable as a starter if you're trying to win a world series? No. Is he viable if you're some what softly trying to punt 2019 to fix the luxury tax? I think that's fair. He's been a league average or so bat who has room to improve if his k rate comes down and he's been roughly average in terms of UZR. He's the prototypical guy you'd love to have as a rebuilding club to go out there and eat games and maybe breakthrough. He's cheap and not going to kill you offensively.Do people really consider Bote a viable starting infield option? If so, why
That's not how arbitration really works though. If they offer him 80% and lose he gets whatever his side submitted and then the only way you get rid of that money is to trade him. In other words, they can't non-tender him now and save money if arbitration doesn't go their way. They are still on the hook.
Think you need to state your intent for 2019. Is he viable as a starter if you're trying to win a world series? No. Is he viable if you're some what softly trying to punt 2019 to fix the luxury tax? I think that's fair. He's been a league average or so bat who has room to improve if his k rate comes down and he's been roughly average in terms of UZR. He's the prototypical guy you'd love to have as a rebuilding club to go out there and eat games and maybe breakthrough. He's cheap and not going to kill you offensively.
And you'd end up paying $1.7 mil regardless if the arbiter sides with him. That's my point. There is no low balling here. That's the reason the non-tender deadline earlier in the offseason matters because after that point you're paying them whatever you either agree on prior to the arbitration or whatever the arbiter says. Even if they were to release him today he'd still be getting whatever that arbiter decides.Like I said. If they offer .8 and his counter is 1.7 and won't budge I would release him at that point to F/A.
Do people really consider Bote a viable starting infield option? If so, why
Bote gets a bad wrap for some reason, but his bat is league average with his terrible year against lefties. He hit righties well. He has great exit velocity on his bat and seems to be a later bloomer. He isnt a scrub, but he isnt Bryant. He could easily start for teams.Do people really consider Bote a viable starting infield option? If so, why
He could start for bad teamsBote gets a bad wrap for some reason, but his bat is league average with his terrible year against lefties. He hit righties well. He has great exit velocity on his bat and seems to be a later bloomer. He isnt a scrub, but he isnt Bryant. He could easily start for teams.
okkkkHe could start for bad teams
So apparently the twins have a 4 year offer out to Donaldson. If they manage to sign him that makes the whole bryant trade market a lot more interesting.
Just want to re-emphasize that the team is not broke and that’s not what not spending money these last two offseasons was aboutLooks like the Cubs won’t even address the glaring hole in the lead off position. If you know you’re this broke organizationally, you absolutely do not sign Kimbrel.
Time to just accept that Theo has zero plan for how to get out of this shit situation his miserable decisions has put this team.
It's worth noting that while the cubs haven't spent money on players they've spent an ass load on development. They've hired like 10+ new positions for pitching coaches who use stuff similar to driveline and they also added several hitting coaches to do like wise. Between that and the equipment those people will need it's not cheap.
I know people get pissy but for me I'm just like... meh. The issue is that once you're over the luxury tax it becomes more and more difficult to get out of it if you don't do what the cubs are doing. And every year you're over it things get worse penalty wise. So, if i have any complaints it's more just that they haven't been active in the trade market though obviously the whole bryant situation is slowing that down.
As for the lead off hitter, I doubt they ever intended to sign one because unless he's just terrible next year Hoerner most likely is going to win the job if not in ST then likely by mid season.
Just want to re-emphasize that the team is not broke and that’s not what not spending money these last two offseasons was about