3-4 ...

paytonisgod

New member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
704
Liked Posts:
239
It's being talked about because it's a possibility. It's not like anyone here is going to make the decisions; so it's about talking about what could happen if the switch was made.

There are some posters on this board who are under the strange idea that switching to the 3-4 would be no big deal and would not ruin a great defense. I and others are trying to show them what a bad idea it would be and what a colossally bad move it would be if we hired some one who did. But by all means continue discussing it. It has about as much use as wondering if the Bears are going to change their uniform colors to hot pink and mauve.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
Peppers can play both DE and OLB in a 3-4. He almost went to some 3-4 teams in free agency with the intention of being an olb though. Lovies system is what liked him inside, most coaches would prefer to get bigger and have him stand up. Scary.

We have McClellin and Peppers at OLB already, and Melton if resigned plus Paea as 3-tech DT/ 3-4 DE tweeners who should be given a shot.

That means we basically need a nose tackle and a middle linebacker, although I think Briggs/Urlacher would be a good ILB duo next year, and worth trying. They would be allowed to blitz more.

So...essentially we need a nose tackle and linebacker depth because our secondary is old enough to adjust to anything. I don't think it would be hard to switch at all.

Peppers would play DE in a 3-4, not OLB.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
3-4 wouldn't work here. We have two maybe three players that would work in it

We have 9 starters that could play it no problem. We're short only one OLB and one NT, and I'm not so sure that Paea couldn't play nose.
 

Run the ball

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
9,943
Liked Posts:
3,898
We have 9 starters that could play it no problem. We're short only one OLB and one NT, and I'm not so sure that Paea couldn't play nose.

I agree, the players are somewhat there already for a transition. It's not such a crazy idea, IMO.
 

Les Grossman

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2011
Posts:
14,606
Liked Posts:
13,309
Paying for Melton to be a 3-4 DE would be a huge waste of money too.

3-4 DEs are using bigger space eating type players.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
Emery made his name as a scout. I simply refuse to believe that a top level talent evaluator would draft Shea McLellin to play as a down lineman.

He's either Urlacher's replacement (more likely since Urlacher hates the Bears and doesn't want to play here anymore), or Emery has ideas about switching to a 3-4.
 

Broc

well baked
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,575
Liked Posts:
9,659
Emery made his name as a scout. I simply refuse to believe that a top level talent evaluator would draft Shea McLellin to play as a down lineman.

He's either Urlacher's replacement (more likely since Urlacher hates the Bears and doesn't want to play here anymore), or Emery has ideas about switching to a 3-4.

And I simply refuse to believe Emery would be dumb enough to blow up a defense that was clearly the strength of the team and was playing at a higher level than the '85 Bears before the injuries started to pile up and make more work for himself when his #1 priority is completely rebuilding the OL up to NFL standards.
 

Run the ball

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
9,943
Liked Posts:
3,898
The defense never played at an 85 level Broc. It was a strength yes, but not even close to that good.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
And I simply refuse to believe Emery would be dumb enough to blow up a defense that was clearly the strength of the team and was playing at a higher level than the '85 Bears before the injuries started to pile up and make more work for himself when his #1 priority is completely rebuilding the OL up to NFL standards.

The OL wasn't bad in the last few weeks, and has not been nearly as bad as exaggerating Cutler fanboys would have us believe.

Emery's job is the whole team, not just putting a wall of invincibility around an average QB so he can have a little more time to miss receivers.
 

Les Grossman

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2011
Posts:
14,606
Liked Posts:
13,309
If you don't think the OL deserves the most attention on this team, then you are high right now.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
And I simply refuse to believe Emery would be dumb enough to blow up a defense that was clearly the strength of the team and was playing at a higher level than the '85 Bears before the injuries started to pile up and make more work for himself when his #1 priority is completely rebuilding the OL up to NFL standards.

They don't belong in the same breath as the 85 defense.

Stop being ridiculous.
 

KittiesKorner

CCS Donator
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jan 4, 2011
Posts:
47,427
Liked Posts:
36,452
Location:
Chicago
If you don't think the OL deserves the most attention on this team, then you are high right now.

esp with such a strong OL draft class coming up. We need a Finks/Vainisi style draft
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
If you don't think the OL deserves the most attention on this team, then you are high right now.

It needs attention. Many areas do. We need more talent at OL, a better TE, help at LB and safety, and eventually a better QB.
 

Warrior Spirit

The Truth
Donator
Joined:
Sep 12, 2010
Posts:
41,927
Liked Posts:
15,379
You would need a different type of linemen and linebackers to run the 3-4 and it's a whole different strategy and scheme than what the Bears have been doing. It's not something you just switch over to on a whim. McClellin's presence alone is not indicative that the Bears are ready to make that switch. If you're going to do it right, you need all the right players to make it work, not just one.
 

malcore

Guest
It needs attention. Many areas do. We need more talent at OL, a better TE, help at LB and safety, and eventually a better QB.

I'll agree with that, but if we draft another safety with our 5 picks...
 

Catch22

New member
Joined:
Aug 22, 2012
Posts:
382
Liked Posts:
89
if they did switch to a 3-4, I think Idonije could actually be a good fit at DE.
 

malcore

Guest
You would need a different type of linemen and linebackers to run the 3-4 and it's a whole different strategy and scheme than what the Bears have been doing. It's not something you just switch over to on a whim. McClellin's presence alone is not indicative that the Bears are ready to make that switch. If you're going to do it right, you need all the right players to make it work, not just one.

True, but what team had all the right players at the time of making the switch?
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
You would need a different type of linemen and linebackers to run the 3-4 and it's a whole different strategy and scheme than what the Bears have been doing. It's not something you just switch over to on a whim. McClellin's presence alone is not indicative that the Bears are ready to make that switch. If you're going to do it right, you need all the right players to make it work, not just one.

The Ravens did it overnight without too much trouble. Indy too. These defensive rosters adapted; they weren't cleaning house.

Peppers, Izzy, Melton would make a fine DE rotation in a 3-4, and Paea could probably play nose if he bulked up just a little. He's strong enough.

The inside 'backers wouldn't be a problem, you'd just need another good OLB.
 

Top