3-4 ...

Les Grossman

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2011
Posts:
14,648
Liked Posts:
13,348
The Ravens did it overnight without too much trouble. Indy too. These defensive rosters adapted; they weren't cleaning house.

Peppers, Izzy, Melton would make a fine DE rotation in a 3-4, and Paea could probably play nose if he bulked up just a little. He's strong enough.

The inside 'backers wouldn't be a problem, you'd just need another good OLB.

DEN did it also when Nolan was there for one year with McDaniels. They were good too.
 

Daa Bearrs

New member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
263
Dumb and pointless move IMO. It's something Josh McDaniels would do in the nightmare scenario he winds up the Bears HC. Let's see, the defense played absolutely great when healthy while the offense underachieved and is clearly the weakness of the team..... soooooo lets completely change the defense and trade all the talent we have on offense!! Shoot me now.

This team doesn't need need to be completely blown up and rebuilt from the ground up on both offense AND defense. Whoever winds up the next coach just needs to FIX THE FUCKING OFFENSIVE LINE and add some more depth to the defense to better deal with injuries and he's got a playoff team next season.

This. And you nailed it 100% with the Josh Mcdaniels reference. Chaging to a 3-4 would be epically Special person.
 

SlipScreen

New member
Joined:
Sep 13, 2012
Posts:
803
Liked Posts:
481
izzy/Melton - DE's
Paea - NT
Peppers/Mcclellin - OLB
Briggs/Free agent - ILB

I don't think it would be THAT terrible of a transition, maybe not perfect but i think the Bears could make it work.
 

Broc

well baked
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,575
Liked Posts:
9,659
Peppers, Izzy, Melton would make a fine DE rotation in a 3-4, and Paea could probably play nose if he bulked up just a little. He's strong enough.

crack_pipe.jpg
 

Warrior Spirit

The Truth
Donator
Joined:
Sep 12, 2010
Posts:
41,927
Liked Posts:
15,379
The Ravens did it overnight without too much trouble. Indy too. These defensive rosters adapted; they weren't cleaning house.

Peppers, Izzy, Melton would make a fine DE rotation in a 3-4, and Paea could probably play nose if he bulked up just a little. He's strong enough.

The inside 'backers wouldn't be a problem, you'd just need another good OLB.
If Paea's really as strong as legend tells he'd be a good fit but I don't think Peppers would be a good fit on the line, maybe at OLB for him.
 

malcore

Guest
If Paea's really as strong as legend tells he'd be a good fit but I don't think Peppers would be a good fit on the line, maybe at OLB for him.


So, as Lovie goes to Arizona, we can trade Cutler, Hester, Davis and our fourth for their 1st and Calais Campbell. /not srs
 
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,195
Liked Posts:
2,572
Location:
New York State(sucks)
To hell the 3-4, like another poster mentioned it`s the flavor of the week. How about just drafting a coule of new offensive lineman, get another in free agency, and draft a young mlb in the first or second round. I think that would be alot easier than having to do this on top of blowing up most of what is still a top tier defense.

Get a free agent LT and TE if possible, and a mlb early in the draft. The fo also has to think about another DE too. Okafor would be a nice addition in the second or third round to groom behind Peppers.

Most of the team is in place and just needs some young offensive lineman, LB, & DE depth to be a legitimate contender. This is very reachable for the Bears fo with their rumored cap space.

Id rather see a few tweeks like this here and there, rather than set the franchise back a few years with a scheme change.

For the poster that made a refference to the Colts, in all fairness they would be lucky to be a 5 win team without Luck as their QB.
 

Urblock

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
19,122
Liked Posts:
12,221
I wonder what the new coach wants. Could make a difference.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
To hell the 3-4, like another poster mentioned it`s the flavor of the week. How about just drafting a coule of new offensive lineman, get another in free agency, and draft a young mlb in the first or second round. I think that would be alot easier than having to do this on top of blowing up most of what is still a top tier defense.

Get a free agent LT and TE if possible, and a mlb early in the draft. The fo also has to think about another DE too. Okafor would be a nice addition in the second or third round to groom behind Peppers.

Most of the team is in place and just needs some young offensive lineman, LB, & DE depth to be a legitimate contender. This is very reachable for the Bears fo with their rumored cap space.

Id rather see a few tweeks like this here and there, rather than set the franchise back a few years with a scheme change.

For the poster that made a refference to the Colts, in all fairness they would be lucky to be a 5 win team without Luck as their QB.

Did switching to a 3-4 set the Ravens back years?
 

PrideisBears

Jordan Sigler’s editor
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Jun 20, 2010
Posts:
39,432
Liked Posts:
29,034
Location:
In the mod forum planning your ban
I jst cant see the 3-4 working for us but hey im down for it if it happens. We have a lot of young players on the come up so bring it
 

Warrior Spirit

The Truth
Donator
Joined:
Sep 12, 2010
Posts:
41,927
Liked Posts:
15,379
The Ravens switch wasn't really overnight and was more of a hybrid defense than a strict 3-4. The moves they made were made with Lewis in mind. When he couldn't cover as much ground as he once did, this defense took some pressure off of him and still put him in position to make plays.
 
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,195
Liked Posts:
2,572
Location:
New York State(sucks)
Did switching to a 3-4 set the Ravens back years?

The Ravens started their franchise as a 3-4 defense and never changed from it numbnuts.

Your going to have to come up with better than that.
 

malcore

Guest
I always felt the 3-4 allowed teams a certain freedom scheme wise and personnel wise. Much easier to find a 3-4 OLB than a 4-3 DE. Also allows for potentially "less money" to be tied up in a defense.

The teams that made the switch completely eventually got the NT they needed. The Bears would need to look for that player.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
The Ravens started their franchise as a 3-4 defense and never changed from it numbnuts.

Your going to have to come up with better than that.

The Ravens ran a 4-3 when Marvin Lewis was their DC for six years, including their Superbowl defense, you clueless twat.
 

Spear

Corpus callosotomy
Joined:
Sep 5, 2012
Posts:
957
Liked Posts:
372
Probably that paea can be a 3-4 nt with "a little bulk". He would need alot of bulk.
 

Broc

well baked
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,575
Liked Posts:
9,659
Which part of what I said (that most people seem to agree with) is your retort supposed to be aimed at?

The part I quoted mostly, but it also applies to your entire premise.

Let's review:

Emery can either maintain his already existing 4-3 defense that just needs a MLB and keep a system all his existing players are very experienced in.

Or he can switch to a 3-4 and and play his entire defensive front (except Shea) out of position in an totally different system while he wastes more picks and FA money trying to find a real NT, DE's, and LB's that actually fit the scheme.

Who the **** does that? Especially when it's glaringly clear to everyone except Cutler haters that the problem this season wasn't the fucking defense. You don't switch to the 3-4 on a whim because it's what all the cool teams are doing. How about we fix the weakest link in the chain instead of hacking up the good part because a handful of meatballs thinks it'd be cooler if we ran a 3-4. The weak link on this team is the OL.

Folks need to take Cutler out of the equation and look at the OL objectively without the hater/homer glasses on. Compared alone to the defensive line it's not even close talent wise. Webb is fucking terrible. Practice squad James Brown should not be starting at LG next season. Garza is overmatched at C and old. Louis is coming off a blown knee. Carimi is even worse than Webb. You need 4 new starters across the board (5 if Louis can't return to form) regardless of how serviceable you think they looked the last 2 weeks.

The #1 priority this offseason should be hiring one of the best offensive HC canidates you can get and putting together an NFL quality OL capable of playing on the defenses level and not blowing up the defense and installing a 3-4 with a bunch of guys playing out of position and regressing them down to the OL's level.
 
Last edited:

Top