SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 6,644
- Liked Posts:
- 6,464
Any clue what positions the Raiders need help at that the Bears could possibly help to package in with a 1st rounder?
A pass-rusher in his prime who's trajectoring as a Hall of Famer is well worth two firsts. Tell me, what Hall of Famers are the Bears likely to get with their next two first rounders?
I'll keep saying what i've been saying in that i'd absolutely love to have K.Mack on the Bears but the cost to get him in draft picks and the $22+ mil per year he wants and with a very very strong free agency and draft for edge rushers i'll pass on Mack and draft one high, sign one in free agency and have L.Floyd as well. Unless one of these young kids we have now really steps up this year then i'd just hit edge rusher hard next offseason.
Damn it i'd love to have K.Mack wearing a Bears uniform though.
Just don't forget that it's two first rounders and $22+ mil per year for 4-5 years.
It has been 18 years since the Bears drafted someone of Mack's calibre.
The free agent class will get decimated by the tag and re-signings and the draft is a 50/50 crap shoot.
You make the deal because HOF players are super rare and if a team is stupid enough to trade one you say thank you.
Done. Sold.
I am fine paying elite prices for elite players. I do not like paying elite prices for pretty good players.
Mack is good, but not worth it. It would NOT put our team over the top. If anything, it would kill what Pace has already worked to rebuild.
If you havent figured it out yet, Pace is about the long game, not mortgaging the future for now. Mack would be mortgaging the future...
Mack is good, but not worth it. It would NOT put our team over the top. If anything, it would kill what Pace has already worked to rebuild.
If you havent figured it out yet, Pace is about the long game, not mortgaging the future for now. Mack would be mortgaging the future...
The free agent class will still have plenty of talent left after some get re-signed and some get tagged, it's that strong and every player in the draft isn't a 50/50 crap shoot. There's a few edge rushers coming out this year that i'd put at more then a 50/50 chance at making it in the NFL. How good or great they can be is up to the player.
As i very clearly said, i would love to get K.Mack and wouldn't be mad at all if we traded for him but i'd rather sign or draft a couple next offseason to go with Floyd.
He is 27, not 33.
The free agent class will still have plenty of talent left after some get re-signed and some get tagged, it's that strong and every player in the draft isn't a 50/50 crap shoot. There's a few edge rushers coming out this year that i'd put at more then a 50/50 chance at making it in the NFL. How good or great they can be is up to the player.
I don't think anyone is alright with paying elite prices for pretty good players so not sure where that one came from.
As i very clearly said, i would love to get K.Mack and wouldn't be mad at all if we traded for him but i'd rather sign or draft a couple next offseason to go with Floyd.
The core ain't ready yet (especially Trubisky), and when they'll be ready (in 2-3 seasons), Mack will already be on the wrong side of the 30.
So one 1st round pick would be a fair price, even a 1st & 3rd rounder in 2019, but more than that, especially two 1st rounders, make no sense for the Bears, since they can easily draft and develop a pass rusher from what seems to be a top heavy OLB class in 2019.
Mack is good, but not worth it. It would NOT put our team over the top. If anything, it would kill what Pace has already worked to rebuild.
If you havent figured it out yet, Pace is about the long game, not mortgaging the future for now. Mack would be mortgaging the future...