[A] Hawks Downed in Toews' Return: CHI 2, PHX 3 OT

DBQHawkFan

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
210
Liked Posts:
0
Yea PMX I was going to go there as well but put Hayes there for some size with JT. They beat the fucking shit out of him last night. Some extremely border line plays that were more penalties not called.



And yea Acco Shaw played a great game but he MUST keep his head in the game. The trip that was not called, was a dumb ass play. AHL stuff. You don't do that. Same with him running around after the whistle earlier.



That is what worries me about Toews. You know that they are going to beat the crap out of him if he has to park in front of thr net. Give that line someone to do that for him. Sharp won't. I think he has become allergic to contact lately. Maybe Hayes.



Hayes-Toews-Kane

Stalberg-Sharp-Hossa

Bickell-Bolland-Shaw

Brunette-Mayers-Kruger
 

Maiden

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
1,148
Liked Posts:
0
This team has been on fire the previous few weeks and what does Q do? He separates 88 and 81??? WTF



Why on earth was OD out there with Leddy for the winning goal. And why was he at the hash marks?



This game was lost in the first period when the glorious chances were not converted to goals. Easily could have gone up 3 or 4 to nothing.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Q won't play Sharp at center, even though Sharp has come out and said straight up that he is comfortable playing center. Kane will be at center before Sharp ends up there. I didn't like the lines last night, aside from Bickell/Bolland/Shaw. I might give them another game, but really, why the **** are the Hawks experimenting with Kane at LW in the playoffs?! Total fucking amateur hour. Kruger may have been OK in the regular season centering in the top six, but his flaws were exposed big time when it came to playoff hockey last night. I would go with Hayes/Toews/Hossa. Sharp/Kane/Stalberg. Toews needs a big body with some nasty out there to protect him from the inevitable cheap shots. I have no idea where to put Kruger, to be perfectly honest.



P.S. I thought the obvious thing to do with Toews coming back, is slotting him in Kruger's spot, and moving Kruger down to the fourth line. Apparently Q and the coaching staff think more of Kruger at center than Kane, which is fucking ridiculous. Kane has played his best hockey of the season at center. Both at the beginning of the season, and the entire last month that Toews was out.
 

R K

Guest
He's the reason the game went to OT and the GLG was deflected... Sheesh.



Goal #1 his Dman fucked him on a play that shouldn't have happened.



Goal #2 was just a piss poor line change and ROCKET, perfectly placed.



WInning goal was deflected.



Some people just don't know what the **** they are watching. Especially the dumb **** that has only 25 posts here and not ONE of them has anything to do with anything OTHER than the fucking goalies.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
I don't know why you guys pay so much attention to an obvious troll. That or he was dropped on his fucking head as a child, multiple times. Let's talk about the REAL reasons this game got away from the Hawks, and ignore the fucking idiot. Shall we?
<
 

R K

Guest
Face offs and personell not playing up to par. Easily fixed IMO.



10 has to be better

81 has to be better

4 has to be better



Odonell has to be waived

Hayes should be in the line up

Olsen should be in the line up.



88 should be back where he belongs at RW or Center if you chose.



The PP actually did NOT look that bad, they just didn't get one in. Although the Seabrook Tying goal was the same as a PP, Craw was pulled.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
I guess, but still that first goal was the game-changer... I think we can all agree with that.



Fucking refs, and I of all people hate placing blame on the refs. -.-
 

R K

Guest
I guess, but still that first goal was the game-changer... I think we can all agree with that.



Fucking refs, and I of all people hate placing blame on the refs. -.-



Then I suppose Hjarlmarsson should have let his GOALIE freeze the PUCK instead of fucking it up for him. Or the Officials should have called the clear TMM on the ice just before.
 

klemmer

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
1,630
Liked Posts:
0
912 between the pipes will not win a quarter final let alone semi final. The problem all season which hasn't been addressed is between he pipes! I admit he looked better than most games but not good enough



Anyone who looks at save % over a season to rate a goalie has shitferbrains.

Anyone who looks at it from game to game doesn't even have that.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
Then I suppose Hjarlmarsson should have let his GOALIE freeze the PUCK instead of fucking it up for him. Or the Officials should have called the clear TMM on the ice just before.



It truly is amazing when you have a bunch of things going on at one time during a game. Maybe 2 refs and 2 linemen supposedly paying attention to detail isn't enough?
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Face offs and personell not playing up to par. Easily fixed IMO.



10 has to be better

81 has to be better

4 has to be better



Odonell has to be waived

Hayes should be in the line up

Olsen should be in the line up.



88 should be back where he belongs at RW or Center if you chose.



The PP actually did NOT look that bad, they just didn't get one in. Although the Seabrook Tying goal was the same as a PP, Craw was pulled.



The first PP unit didn't look bad, but the second unit was complete garbage. They didn't generate anything on the PP. So, the Hawks basically turned every 2 minute PP into 1:00-1:15. They have to do something with that second PP unit. For starters, Bolland should be on it, PLAYING UP FRONT. Amazingly enough, he was the leading faceoff guy for the Hawks last night. Q's obsession with Brunette was a huge gaff last night, especially on that second PP unit.
 

R K

Guest
well when you stack your first one like they have the 2nd one is bound to have issues. Just he way it is.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
I thought we had the depth to counter this issue, though? Seems like the Hawks need to go back to the drawing board....
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
well when you stack your first one like they have the 2nd one is bound to have issues. Just he way it is.



I guess I don't understand the need to stack the 1st PP unit with ALL of the elite forwards.



Leddy/Seabrook

Sharp/Toews/Kane



Keith/Oduya

Shaw/Bolland/Hossa



Is there something wrong with those PP lines that I'm missing? Has Sharp worked playing the point at any point this season?
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
Those lines look good to me, Pez.



Would be nice to see Hayes in there from time to time too. Sometimes we need his big butt in front of the net.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
I just don't understand how the Hawks continually botch lineup decisions that seem like no-brainers and common sense to pretty much everyone.





Those lines look good to me, Pez.



Would be nice to see Hayes in there from time to time too. Sometimes we need his big butt in front of the net.



Well, Hayes would have to dress, first. For some reason, Hayes seems to be one of the players Q has an unhealthy hate for, for some reason.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
Yet I see more potential in production from Hayes than I do from Brunette, but that's just me.



I'm not Q, though... -.-.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
whoever-Kane-Hossa

Sharp-Toews-Stalberg

obvious third line is obvious



keith-seabrook

hammer-oduya

leddy-olsen



I don't fucking see why not?
 

Top