TC in Mississippi
CCS Staff
- Joined:
- Oct 22, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,305
- Liked Posts:
- 1,816
I love when people say they don't want to pay Jake 30 million at age 36 as if that matters. Of course no one wants to pay a 36 year old 30 million but you feel a lot better about it if you get him for 30 million at ages 32 and earlier.
The Cubs risk saving money by offering him a contract now to get more info later. Maybe they won't need an ace like Jake and can spend money on their hitters new deals? The reason I would have been for a new deal (especially with an opt after four years) is that odds are you won't get Jake for just four years in two years but you can potentially get him for six now. And the Cubs really won't have to worry about having "too much money" tied up in their arms until their youths (Bryant, Russell, Schwarber) become FA after 2021 (aka six seasons).
All I'm saying is that they have to be smart. If reports are to be believed he wants 7/$200 mil including the buyout of his remaining arb year. I get it, if I were him I'd want that too, I also think the Cubs are going to start having to pay some real money in arbitration awards to their young core in 2018 and I don't see a Cubs payroll ever exceeding say $170 mil, at least not in today's dollars. If money is no object then heck yeah, sign him up. If it is they'll be looking for alternatives. Frankly I don't care either way as long as they have a true #1 pitcher at the top of that rotation.