Astros To The AL West

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I would also argue that NL pitchers are better bunters and baserunners than the AL counterparts
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Again let's look at this logically. The NL team gains an advantage as they get to use a real hitter and not a pitcher in AL parks. The AL loses when it goes to NL parks as it loses a top 2-3 hitter replaced with an auto out pitcher

You don't have free subbing as you are suggesting because the fielders are paid to hit and field and they practice both so you deal with a weakness.

Because NL Bench Players are so good at hitting :rolleyes:
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Compared to pitchers? Yeah like loads

Look,
NL Bench Player plays when AL DH plays. HUGE advantage AL.
NL Pitcher Bats when AL Pitcher Bats. BOTH suck.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
Look,
NL Bench Player plays when AL DH plays. HUGE advantage AL.
NL Pitcher Bats when AL Pitcher Bats. BOTH suck.

You also have missed the point. When the AL team plays in the NL park the team is penalized. When the NL team plays in the AL park they get an advantage.

You have to compare what they have normally vs what they have in IL play
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
You also have missed the point. When the AL team plays in the NL park the team is penalized. When the NL team plays in the AL park they get an advantage.

You have to compare what they have normally vs what they have in IL play

They get an advantage over what they normally have, but that is still less than what the AL club gets normally...
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
Al has to lose its DH in NL parks. I don't see how the NL is at a disadvantage.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
They get an advantage over what they normally have, but that is still less than what the AL club gets normally...

Glad you agree. The AL team gets nothing and only loses.

True fairness would be each team plays with it's league rules regardless of parks. That is logically fair and removes the bias the NL always has currently. I'm not sure if the AL team can get a competitive advantage

The other answer is to remove the dh/batting pitchers altogether
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Al has to lose its DH in NL parks. I don't see how the NL is at a disadvantage.

The AL has a pitcher, so does the NL, both suck, so they have even resources. The NL doesn't have a DH to begin with, so the AL losing their's evens the playing field. But at AL fields, the AL keeps its DH while the NL has to use a bench player, which while it may be an upgrade over a pitcher, still is less than the AL has normally.
 

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,009
Liked Posts:
9,558
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
What? No reactions to a BCS-style system? I was dead serious when I posted that idea.
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
The AL has a pitcher, so does the NL, both suck, so they have even resources. The NL doesn't have a DH to begin with, so the AL losing their's evens the playing field. But at AL fields, the AL keeps its DH while the NL has to use a bench player, which while it may be an upgrade over a pitcher, still is less than the AL has normally.

Yeah, I get that, but the the DH is a big part of an American League offense. AL teams that have to go the NL lose one of their power bats. That is a lot worse than "well the NL has to use a bench player as a DH".
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Glad you agree. The AL team gets nothing and only loses.

True fairness would be each team plays with it's league rules regardless of parks. That is logically fair and removes the bias the NL always has currently. I'm not sure if the AL team can get a competitive advantage

The other answer is to remove the dh/batting pitchers altogether

No, because the AL having the DH in the first place is an advantage, they lose it to level the playing field at NL fields. The NL getting to bat a bench player doesn't even the playing field at AL fields where the AL gets a real DH though.

But it doesn't matter because all NL teams have to deal with the same problem, so the NL standings even out between its clubs.
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
No, because the AL having the DH in the first place is an advantage, they lose it to level the playing field at NL fields. The NL getting to bat a bench player doesn't even the playing field at AL fields where the AL gets a real DH though.

But it doesn't matter because all NL teams have to deal with the same problem, so the NL standings even out between its clubs.

Its a "disadvantage" they do to themselves. Why punish the AL team because the NL won't add the DH.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Wrong. The NL pitcher is a superior non fielder with hitting, bunting, and base running

Still not the same as the difference between a bench player whose fielding assets are taken away and a DH.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Still not the same as the difference between a bench player whose fielding assets are taken away and a DH.

If the NL manager weren't Special person he'd move one of his sluggers to the DH spot and use the better fielding guy in the field.

If all things were equal you guys would have a point about the AL losing their crutch, but things aren't equal. That's why the AL dominates interleague no matter which park they are in.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
The AL team loses a 10-20% payroll guy in the NL. The NL loses nothing.

The only thing that you NL guys keep saying is that the AL is better than the NL and that this is the only way to give the NL a shot
 
Last edited:

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
NL is disadvantaged at AL fields no matter how you look at it.

Micah Hoffpauir (IK he's in Japan now) or Adam Dunn (when he doesn't suck)

Hmmm... tough choice :thinking:

And the AL only added a DH because nobody went to their games and the NL teams were more popular. NL doesn't need to do it, so it isn't them refusing.
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
Another point is that when the AL loses its DH during the process of "leveling the field!!!!1", NL hitters hit a lot better than AL hitters.
 

Top