Baldinger Breaks down Mitch vs the 49ers

[remydat]

Why the **** would I know what he thinks of us putting up 14? Go ask him on Twitter so he can roast you too. And do you seriously think guys like Carter who are responsible for all major sports other than just football took time out of their day to watch the Bears play the 4 win 49ers. Of course they didn’t.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You claim he is providing this great analysis. I would think he should expect to answer why we only scored 14 points. Several people already brought it up on twitter in that same link you posted and he doesn't have an answer. So I can only surmise, he really hasn't studied the game that carefully. Just throw together some clicks to sell his given narrative just like everyone else does.

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

You claim he is providing this great analysis. I would think he should expect to answer why we only scored 14 points. Several people already brought it up on twitter in that same link you posted and he doesn't have an answer. So I can only surmise, he really hasn't studied the game that carefully. Just throw together some clicks to sell his given narrative just like everyone else does.

Please link me to where I said he provided “great analysis”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[remydat]

I am not kidding in any fashion.

You and I been posting here a long time Briggs. I know you! I just don't want WCBF getting all butt hurt like he usually does and spending countless pages debating with someone fucking around.

 

[xer0h0ur]

The point is all of it is entertainment. Only difference here is Baldringer is hyping up Trubs so you guys are eating it up. Ya'll acting like this is some insightful analysis. It isn't. All these guys are just selling clicks. Good and bad.

Unless you have suddenly learned how to monetize twitter posts you're full of shit.

 

[remydat]

Please link me to where I said he provided “great analysis”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LMFAO, you posts were clearly hyping up his analysis and claiming CCS was wrong because of it. Again, all I want to know is why we only scored 14 points or 17 if you count the missed FG. I never realized 14-17 points on O could prove so many people wrong.

He seems very impressed to say the least. But that’s funny I thought it was a game mangery game and an unacceptable offensive performance
https://twitter.com/baldynfl/status/1077321306763395072?s=21

Who knew the doomsday predictiors on CCS could be wrong??

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

Unless you have suddenly learned how to monetize twitter posts you're full of shit.

The Remy vortex strikes again


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Black Rainbow]

Lmao Baldinger doesn't know wtf he's talking about.

14 points is not good play lmao. Like Baldinger's job is just to hype up the young players in this league. He doesn't want to talk about the EGREGIOUS non-int and the dog shit pass to Cohen who fumbled.

Should. Have. Drafted. Watson.

I cannot believe I'm reading this post from Briggs is GOAT.

 

[remydat]

I think Waddle watches the games too and he was a little bit critical of the offensive performance last night. Baldinger is right too, but c'mon, he's clearly a hype man and his schtick is to play the superhomer role. He's not trying to give a balanced break down



Buddy, my point was that Bears fans want to know what's holding this offense back from scoring like the top offenses in the league. You cherry picked my mentioning of Watson and went off on a tangent to fight a strawman. If you're not sure of my point then re-read my post or re-read the first sentence of this paragraph

[video=youtube;EXz6VIiGi1Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXz6VIiGi1Y&t=78s[/video]

Guess Waddle is just a hater.

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

LMFAO, you posts were clearly hyping up his analysis and claiming CCS was wrong because of it. Again, all I want to know is why we only scored 14 points or 17 if you count the missed FG. I never realized 14-17 points on O could prove so many people wrong.

Yes I said you were wrong. That doesn’t mean I said this is great analysis so again thank you for putting words in my mouth. You’re still not so good at assuming my position but keep trying I’m sure you’ll get there one day. Also the Seahawks scored 23 which is only 2 more FGs and considering our uncharacteristic lack of ball security i would say we are fine


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

[video=youtube;EXz6VIiGi1Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXz6VIiGi1Y&t=78s[/video]

Guess Waddle is just a hater.

I take it you missed “we’re just nit picking now” and “wow 11-4 I wouldn’t get infront of that train” or “maybe a slightly above average offense”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bamainatlanta]

I think Waddle watches the games too and he was a little bit critical of the offensive performance last night. Baldinger is right too, but c'mon, he's clearly a hype man and his schtick is to play the superhomer role. He's not trying to give a balanced break down



Buddy, my point was that Bears fans want to know what's holding this offense back from scoring like the top offenses in the league. You cherry picked my mentioning of Watson and went off on a tangent to fight a strawman. If you're not sure of my point then re-read my post or re-read the first sentence of this paragraph

Houston isn't a top offense.
Do you even know what strawman means?

 

[remydat]

Yes I said you were wrong. That doesn’t mean I said this is great analysis so again thank you for putting words in my mouth. You’re still not so good at assuming my position but keep trying I’m sure you’ll get there one day. Also the Seahawks scored 23 which is only 2 more FGs and considering our uncharacteristic lack of ball security i would say we are fine


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right and if the Niners had scored 2 more FGs then they would have beat us so not sure your point. Scoring 6 ppg more is kind of a big deal. 23 points vs 14 or 17 points is the difference between an average offense and a shit offense. The offense was shit yesterday. Also Wilson also put up 37 on the Niners as well since he played them twice so I think he is doing fine.

 

[Zion]

Houston isn't a top offense.
Do you even know what strawman means?

Forget Watson and Houston, it doesn't affect my point. JFC

 

[remydat]

I take it you missed “we’re just nit picking now” and “wow 11-4 I wouldn’t get infront of that train” or “maybe a slightly above average offense”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes I think it obvious that when you are 11-4, what we are doing is nitpicking areas of concern for when we play against playoff teams. You just get all emo about it and so we end up arguing about it for pages and you end up starting more threads to argue the same thing.

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

Right and if the Niners had scored 2 more FGs then they would have beat us so not sure your point. Scoring 6 ppg more is kind of a big deal. 23 points vs 14 or 17 points is the difference between an average offense and a shit offense. The offense was shit yesterday. Also Wilson also put up 37 on the Niners as well since he played them twice so I think he is doing fine.

LMFAO we are talking about 6 more points in 1 game not 6 more points PPG. Okay though. The difference is the 49ers had 3 red zone trips and got 9 points in the first half. Again if not for our lack of ball security it is more than plausible to say we would score more


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

Yes I think it obvious that when you are 11-4, what we are doing is nitpicking areas of concern for when we play against playoff teams. You just get all emo about it and so we end up arguing about it for pages and you end up starting more threads to argue the same thing.

If this is your version of nitpicking I never want to see you actually complain about something


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bamainatlanta]

Forget Watson and Houston, it doesn't affect my point. JFC

Translation - I wasn't right (about Watson & Houston)but I can't admit it. Got it

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

Forget Watson and Houston, it doesn't affect my point. JFC

What exactly is your point? I don’t think you have one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[remydat]

LMFAO we are talking about 6 more points in 1 game not 6 more points PPG. Okay though. The difference is the 49ers had 3 red zone trips and got 9 points in the first half. Again if not for our lack of ball security it is more than plausible to say we would score more


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah if not for the lack of ball security by the the teams that keep turning the ball over to us, we would score less too but not sure your point. Like how many things do you want to excuse? Now we tracking almost points and taking away turnovers? What else. I mean if not for the Giants scoring more than us, we would have won. Your excuses are getting ridiculous. It was a poor offensive performance period.

 

[remydat]

If this is your version of nitpicking I never want to see you actually complain about something


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I actually made a single post saying 14 points was not Super Bowl worthy offense. A normal person probably agrees and moves on. All the homers decided that they wanted to debate how 14 points was really an great performance and here we are.

Some of you need to learn when to let things go. Arguing about how 14 points is really good because the Niners are some up and coming D is really not worth it but for some reason you want to dig in. I really have no clue how such an innocent comment based in reality could result in some much emo from you and others.