Rise
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 8,248
- Liked Posts:
- 7,971
- Location:
- Mom's Basement
I think the deal will be Johnson + 3 1sts for Wilson + 2022 3rd + 2023 2nd.
would rather give up mack than JJ.I think the deal will be Johnson + 3 1sts for Wilson + 2022 3rd + 2023 2nd.
no that he might not be as good in the twilight stage of his career because 1) he’s been hit way more and 2) he relies on his mobility a lot more. That means wilson will eventually need to become a pocket passer with a solid offensive line. the cost of acquiring wilson will make that a lot harder.
i’m not concerned at all about wilson’s ability to become a pocket passer. he has more than enough accuracy for that. i’m concerned with fielding an offensive line to protect a 36 year old+ Wilson with limited escape ability.Wilson is already a great passer and IMO the best deep ball thrower in the NFL. He doesn't have to run as long as he can just scramble out of danger enough to get the pass off and scrambling is something he's also very good at.
No, the reason they got the 3rd pick was to take Goff and his salary back.
what I don’t understand with Colin’s take however is how exactly the bears would give back 5 first rounders when you are not allowed to trade more than 3?
would rather give up mack than JJ.
I think the deal will be Johnson + 3 1sts for Wilson + 2022 3rd + 2023 2nd.
i’m curious about how y’all feel about this. i was talking to my buddy about the Bears trading for Wilson and he pointed out hes 32 and Pace would probably over pay. i came up with the obvious response of “well yeah but look at rodgers and brady they’re 37 and 43”. i was not expecting the response of “yeah but wilson has been hit a lot more than both of them”. This bother you enough to think twice about the move?
No, the reason they got the 3rd pick was to take Goff and his salary back.
what I don’t understand with Colin’s take however is how exactly the bears would give back 5 first rounders when you are not allowed to trade more than 3?
CB will be scary thin when we move on from fuller if JJ is dealt.So would I, which is why I said it would be JJ. I think Seattle will prefer him as well.
i’m not concerned at all about wilson’s ability to become a pocket passer. he has more than enough accuracy for that. i’m concerned with fielding an offensive line to protect a 36 year old+ Wilson with limited escape ability.
honestly yeah. i would still trade for russ if we can but it is something to consider moving forward.So you're worried that in 4 years we won't have a good o-line?
Wilson won't go for that much.I think the deal will be Johnson + 3 1sts for Wilson + 2022 3rd + 2023 2nd.
I think the deal will be Johnson + 3 1sts for Wilson + 2022 3rd + 2023 2nd.
Are you saying 3 1sts + 2022 3rd + 2023 2nd + Johnson for Wilson? Or 3 1sts + Johnson for Wilson and Seattle 2022 3rd + 2023 2nd. If it's the former, that's an overpay to me. But I realize I'm probably in the minority there.
CB will be scary thin when we move on from fuller if JJ is dealt.
the ladder, Seattle would give back a 3rd and 2nd
Wilson won't go for that much.