Bears should trade for Haskins

[fx1718]

Bears are in a better situation than the Dolphins.

They wont be if they trade for Haskins.

 

[ijustposthere]

They wont be if they trade for Haskins.

Yes they will. They are better all around than the dolphins.

 

[BaBaBlacksheep]

Dont care. Fuck Ohio State

ha ha. Fuck Ohio State is always the right answer.

 

[sevvy]

Fuck you OSU haters! Justin Fields > *

 

[Hawkeye OG]

I'm up for anything at this point. I do like the thought of trading for a young QB rather than signing a vet like Mariota/Keenum/Winston or trading for Dalton/Cam.

 

[LetsGo34]

I'd hope that his failure would show him that white QBs are on the way out in this league.

Lol, what?

 

[ijustposthere]

Lol, what?

They're a thing of the past.

 

[Pegger]

Haskins is doomed to fail. He's like Mitch in that he was only a one year starter in college. He's a little different in that much of his college production was hitting WRs that were 3+ yards open. He's having a lot of trouble with his mechanics, keeping his eyes downfield and the overall speed of the game.

I'd add, Haskins was a Dan Snyder pick. His son went to school with them and they were buddies. For Dan Snyder to cut bait on him this early you have to know he's just terrible.

As an overarching theme I'd say with the QB position settling for someone that 'has to be better than Mitch' isn't good enough. Look at a player/prospect and seriously ask 'can I see the team winning a Superbowl with this player?' If the answer is 'no' then they have no purpose on your roster.

 

[Pegger]

Would not be opposed. Can’t be worse than Mitch.

You can't look at it this way with the QB position.

Getting slightly better leaves you in the same spot where you are just looking to replace that guy 1-2 years later. You get completely stuck in a spot where you have no chance to win.

 

[westcoast bear fanatic]

A big no to Haskins, he's the next Geno Smith.

 

[Warrior Spirit]

Yes they will. They are better all around than the dolphins.

Dolphins have 5 first round picks and 4 2nd round picks over the next 2 years. In far better position to fix their problems than the Bears are. Building through the draft, that's how the Niners did it.

 

[ijustposthere]

Dolphins have 5 first round picks and 4 2nd round picks over the next 2 years. In far better position to fix their problems than the Bears are. Building through the draft, that's how the Niners did it.

If they hit.

 

[Penny Traitor]

As an overarching theme I'd say with the QB position settling for someone that 'has to be better than Mitch' isn't good enough. Look at a player/prospect and seriously ask 'can I see the team winning a Superbowl with this player?' If the answer is 'no' then they have no purpose on your roster.

Please stop making logical posts. I have been trying to hate on Eagles fans for decades now and you are making me question my own convictions with every tap of the "Like" icon.

 

[Warrior Spirit]

If they hit.

Have to take the shots to hit and they're given a bunch more shots to take than the Bears.

 

[LetsGo34]

They're a thing of the past.

Is that what your womens studies professor told you? Lmao

 

[Pegger]

Please stop making logical posts. I have been trying to hate on Eagles fans for decades now and you are making me question my own convictions with every tap of the "Like" icon.

Nah, your right. Eagle fans are mainly meatballs. With that being said their are always good fans for every single team.

Except the Cowboys. All of those fans are human garbage.

 

[Pegger]

A big no to Haskins, he's the next Geno Smith.

He's got a long way to go before he's Geno Smith.

Let's call him the 'poor man's Geno'.

 

[WestCoastBearsFan]

You can't look at it this way with the QB position.

Getting slightly better leaves you in the same spot where you are just looking to replace that guy 1-2 years later. You get completely stuck in a spot where you have no chance to win.

I haven’t watched much of Haskins at all, but he can’t as innacurate as Mitch right? And I mean consistently missing wide open receivers? Acquiring a QB with that basic ability is a pretty significant upgrade by itself.

 

[ijustposthere]

Haskins is doomed to fail. He's like Mitch in that he was only a one year starter in college. He's a little different in that much of his college production was hitting WRs that were 3+ yards open. He's having a lot of trouble with his mechanics, keeping his eyes downfield and the overall speed of the game.

I'd add, Haskins was a Dan Snyder pick. His son went to school with them and they were buddies. For Dan Snyder to cut bait on him this early you have to know he's just terrible.

As an overarching theme I'd say with the QB position settling for someone that 'has to be better than Mitch' isn't good enough. Look at a player/prospect and seriously ask 'can I see the team winning a Superbowl with this player?' If the answer is 'no' then they have no purpose on your roster.

I'm interested in Haskins because I think the coaching staff will have a blank slate to work with, not because he can be marginally better than Trubisky. That's a question mark. Maybe he becomes great, maybe he's worse, maybe he's the same, I don't know. I just know it'd be basically the same as drafting a QB except he has gotten some sort of playing time at the NFL level. His release certainly concerns me, just seems really slow, but I did like the way he moved in the pocket in the last game. We'll see how he progresses this season, but the Redskins are just such a horrible franchise and situation. I honestly think they are the worst team in the league.

The Snyder bit is interesting, that I didn't know.

 

[ijustposthere]

Is that what your womens studies professor told you? Lmao