Bears Trade for All Pro OG Joe Thuney

BaBaBlacksheep

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,499
Liked Posts:
55,115
Diehardfan said:
That kind of thinking is off base as well. If he signs Dahlman into the mix, the most important thing other than the OL upgrade is the fact that they don't have to draft any particular position. They can take the BPA. If they think that's Jeanty, fine....if it's an edge rusher, also fine. The #10 will have a ton of options....including trading it.
Click to expand...

I’m thinking it’s not Dalman
 
DefNextYear

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,708
Liked Posts:
3,566
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
remydat said:
@DefNextYear ball is in your court.
Click to expand...
Simple as:

My point was equivalent to saying picking 10th overall and there aren’t any blue chips at 10 and you telling me that a 6th round pick could become an all pro. You butt in with another point entirely even though I offered to try to clarify my point and say you’re saying something else entirely. You ignore that finding those kinds of players are more difficult in the 6th round. I called them coin flip players. You admit they’re difficult to find and you’re incapable of doing it. I’m aware random players can pan out, but they’re likelihood of hitting drop from the top guys.

You also said Fries is an impact player who will cost 10 million for one year. I say
DefNextYear said:
And to keep picking on [Fries] specifically, if he’s truly an impact player and costs only 14 million, the Colts will re-sign him. So, either he’s re-signed and another name off your list, or he’s not my definition of an impact guy.

Again, call whoever you want an impact player. I don’t agree with your list. It’s ok to disagree.
Click to expand...

I also said the problem is 20+ teams can afford 10 million, which means you’re bidding with others on a talent pool that is diminishing. Since you posted the list, a couple of the names you had were taken off the list via tag or new contract, like I said would happen.

I quoted the Breer logic in the new topic cause it follows my logic. Teams need to be skeptical of guys in free agency cause teams have money to retain their talent.

You telling me that random dudes like Baun can be found does not meet my definition, but you refuse to accept my definition. So, I have chosen I’ll just be an asshole and chastise you instead.
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,762
Liked Posts:
41,523
DefNextYear said:
Simple as:

My point was equivalent to saying picking 10th overall and there aren’t any blue chips at 10 and you telling me that a 6th round pick could become an all pro. You butt in with another point entirely even though I offered to try to clarify my point and say you’re saying something else entirely. You ignore that finding those kinds of players are more difficult in the 6th round. I called them coin flip players. You admit they’re difficult to find and you’re incapable of doing it. I’m aware random players can pan out, but they’re likelihood of hitting drop from the top guys.

You also said Fries is an impact player who will cost 10 million for one year. I say


I also said the problem is 20+ teams can afford 10 million, which means you’re bidding with others on a talent pool that is diminishing. Since you posted the list, a couple of the names you had were taken off the list via tag or new contract, like I said would happen.

I quoted the Breer logic in the new topic cause it follows my logic. Teams need to be skeptical of guys in free agency cause teams have money to retain their talent.

You telling me that random dudes like Baun can be found does not meet my definition, but you refuse to accept my definition. So, I have chosen I’ll just be an asshole and chastise you instead.
Click to expand...
@HeHateMe let me know if you willing to translate this into a coherent argument.
 
baselman1974

baselman1974

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 26, 2014
Posts:
3,846
Liked Posts:
4,144
Location:
Palos Hills, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
I think the Bears might trade for Erik McCoy from the Saints for a 3rd round pick. I think this is a quick Oline fix, and eventually draft replacements.
 

cwcwcwcw1

Active member
Joined:
Feb 3, 2023
Posts:
331
Liked Posts:
229
My favorite teams
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
legendxofxlink said:
Looks like we’re winning 2 super bowls now. Everywhere he’s been he’s gotten 2 rings.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but one or both of those may not count. Per the vortex in a different thread ... depending on a teams defense and the QB play ... some Super Bowls don't count.
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,762
Liked Posts:
41,523
cwcwcwcw1 said:
Yeah, but one or both of those may not count. Per the vortex in a different thread ... depending on a teams defense and the QB play ... some Super Bowls don't count.
Click to expand...
No they count for the team, players and fans. They simply are discounted for purposes of GOAT discussions.
 
Chief Walking Stick

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
48,988
Liked Posts:
27,567
HeHateMe said:
I looked at that and decided I need to go to an optometrist because I almost passed out.
Click to expand...
If you pass out on the last line at your optometrist appointment and it looks blurry, you may have high blood pressure. This is a very serious exam and you should be well rested and hydrated prior.
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,762
Liked Posts:
41,523
cwcwcwcw1 said:
Hmmm ... looks back to the first line of the post ....



Interesting ...
Click to expand...
Not an ad hominem as I clearly explained in the sentence following why he was stupid by rebutting his argument. An ad hominem would be if I attacked him as a means to avoid addressing his argument. I addressed his argument quite clearly. So I merely insulted him.

Further, he responded to me in post 261. The post he responded to contained no insults. Yet he decided to insult me so I responded because I am a petty like that.
 
Last edited:
SugarWalls

SugarWalls

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 17, 2013
Posts:
7,632
Liked Posts:
7,416
@DefNextYear

Don’t worry, @remydat is a renowned moron. He one time created his own grading system (probably spent a good bit of time on it btw) explaining how the bears had improved and then they finished dead last in the NFL. World class stuff.

He has several other completely idiotic takes like when he claimed he knew he was inside poles brane and how poles wasn’t drafting OL and then they drafted Darnell wright 😂🤣😂
 
knoxville7

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
21,009
Liked Posts:
15,013
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
remydat said:
Ok we have someonw with well known member status who thinks what CCS thinks of people matters. Given that fact and the disparity in our CCS status, can you please here him out and if you consider any of his arguments worthy you can debate with me on his behalf HoFer to HoFer.

Please discuss compensation with him if you wish to be compensated for your time.

Thanks buddy. You are truly a CCS legend.
Click to expand...
*hear
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,946members
96,334threads
4,575,693posts
1,043online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 1,043 (members: 34, guests: 1,009)
Top