- Joined:
- Apr 11, 2009
- Posts:
- 23,669
- Liked Posts:
- 7,425
My favorite teams
I suppose part of it is dependent on what you expect Rose to be. I'm not really expecting him to drop 20 a game every time out, especially if he's still seeing double. Imo Rose has been great passing the ball this year. He could easily have 8 assists per game were it not for some missed shots on the receiving end. It definitely looks way better than last season. His shot selection has also looked better this year. He's like 3-21 on 3s or something, but he's not chucking them like he has been. Not nearly as many early in the shot clock contested 3s..more so end of the shot clock desperation shots which is just consequential. His form looks better and his midrange jumper looks to be a more integral part of his game again.i wouldn't even say Rose is average....as of now i'd say he just sucks and thats me being truthfully honest and not because im mad at something he said in the media or that he didn't come back for the playoffs after being cleared
last year he took 16 shots for 17 points and in the playoffs he took 19 shots for 20 points and really wasn't making up doing much on defense...plus you gotta take in the fact Rose was highly inconsistent so you never knew what Rose you were gonna get that night.....this year so far has been more of the same but worse
A reasonable knock on Rose to me is the inconsistent effort. To me, it only seems like he tries against certain players/teams...usually the ones with good PGs (Wall, Curry, Kyrie, Conley, CP3). And if you look at his track record against those guys, he actually does pretty well...except against Curry, but that guy is basically a living cheat code. But against everyone else, it looks like he just sleepwalks through the game at times. That first Charlotte game this year didn't seem like Rose was trying at all. And I'm sure everyone can think of countless other times where he's done this. Funnily enough, I expected this Pacers game to be like that, but he actually tried on both ends.