pdxbearsfan
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 8, 2021
- Posts:
- 5,645
- Liked Posts:
- 1,868
Yes to this.When I look at Stroud his nfl comparison is Justin Fields.
When I look at Young I see a poor mans Kyler Murray.
Yes to this.When I look at Stroud his nfl comparison is Justin Fields.
When I look at Young I see a poor mans Kyler Murray.
Sure they can. Your analysis is way too Bears centric. I doubt anyone really respects the Bears as decision makers anyway. They'll do their own research with Fields.Lololol. If a team has a franchise QB, they don’t draft another one and then determine the other “franchise QB” isn’t the guy. This isn’t hard.
To which anyone with half a brain would respond, "You had the #1 overall pick, that was your chance to make it work".It would be a disservice to the organization if they did not scout the top quarterbacks.
The more I think about it, it makes more sense for poles to keep fields. If fields does fail he can say I never drafted him, he's not my qb. Give me my qb and I can make it work.
Do you understand sarcasm?? Or are you always this seriousYou should punt this take into the sun it is so ridiculous.
Lolol. I can’t even justify a response to this nonsense. I’m pretty sure you haven’t even looked at the QB FA market as well.Sure they can. Your analysis is way too Bears centric. I doubt anyone really respects the Bears as decision makers anyway. They'll do their own research with Fields.
The bottom line is this:
Would you rather have Justin Fields leading your team in 2023/2024 or Malik Willis, Carson Wentz, Taylor Heinecke, Zach Wilson, Joe Flacco, Colt Mccoy?
That's all that matters.
if you think Fields has no trade value then you must think he's a shit QB. Period.Lolol. I can’t even justify a response to this nonsense. I’m pretty sure you haven’t even looked at the QB FA market as well.
And to which anyone with a full brain. Would respond, "fields has shown enough to warrant them to build the team around him".To which anyone with half a brain would respond, "You had the #1 overall pick, that was your chance to make it work".
Which makes Fields Poles guy. Poles couldn't then act like he hadn't tied himself to Fields.And to which anyone with a full brain. Would respond, "fields has shown enough to warrant them to build the team around him".
No you dipshit. If Poles signals that he is moving on from him, then his trade value is diminished. He’s basically saying “we don’t think he can be the guy.”I
if you think Fields has no trade value then you must think he's a shit QB. Period.
Which people are you referring to?I'd also like to know why people believe "teams have learned". Seriously, where does that even come from? Your personal perception of a QB doesn't mean shit. Doesn't negate what NFL teams are willing to do.
Teams moved mountains (in draft capital) for RG3, Goff, Wentz, Lance etc.
If there's anything you should have learned as a fan is that NFL teams haven't learned shit. Desperate teams take drastic measures and that will not change anytime soon.
If you focus on reading other posters posts rather than just try to get a rise out of people maybe you will find those people. I’ve seen what he’s talking about in multiple threads this morningWhich people are you referring to?
I wasn't talking to you.If you focus on reading other posters posts rather than just try to get a rise out of people maybe you will find those people. I’ve seen what he’s talking about in multiple threads this morning
You're a moronThe whole point is we have two franchise QBs among our assets. One will be traded.
I know that's why we have Justin Fields! ?There's something to be said about getting younger in a total rebuild, even at the QB position.
I know that's why we have Justin Fields! ?
And with that Fields should have better pieces around him next year with the larger cap space and the multi draft picks they're going to get in the off season.Fields already heading into his 3rd year rookie deal . . . #brutal
That's not how asset valuation works. Teams don't give a shit what the Bears think. Why would they?No you dipshit. If Poles signals that he is moving on from him, then his trade value is diminished. He’s basically saying “we don’t think he can be the guy.”
Every GM in the league will look at him as a project from that point forward. Poles will not draft a QB at #1 and then deal the loser of the competition later. It simply doesn’t work like that. Common sense.
His trade value has nothing to do with Poles moving on or not and everything to do with every other GM that needs a QB and how they are evaluating him.No you dipshit. If Poles signals that he is moving on from him, then his trade value is diminished. He’s basically saying “we don’t think he can be the guy.”
Every GM in the league will look at him as a project from that point forward. Poles will not draft a QB at #1 and then deal the loser of the competition later. It simply doesn’t work like that. Common sense.