Ovechkin - in 28 playoff games played, he has 40 points. In the post season, players are expected to have a drop off in production. OV has actually over-performed in the playoffs (1.29 ppg in regular season including this year vs 1.42 ppg in playoffs). Now that's a much better sample size than a single series against Montreal. Is that a choker? Now, if you want to look at that one series, who was it who shut OV down? Oh yeah, it's that guy Josh Gorges, who is a Los Angeles King. Thanks for making my argument for moving Gorges to the top defense pairing with Lidstrom, already an epic regular season and playoff defenseman who will shut down any line in front of them.
Thornton - Is he really a playoff choker? That the perception..but could the perception be wrong? I mean, as a Shark, that team was expected for deep playoff runs. When a team doesn't reach those (possibly false) expectations, someone has to be a scapegoat...might as well be the captain, right? How often do President Trophy winning teams win the Cup since the lockout, 1. Thornton is a .71 ppg player in the playoff, which is down from his regular season production. In the playoffs, however, a drop off in production is generally expected.
As for your ring argument (which you brought up, by the way), here's the count:
Malkin 1, Hossa 1, Seabrook 1, Orpik 1, = 4 different players, 4 rings
Homstrom 4, Brouwer 1, Cooke 1, Madden 3, Lidstrom 4, Kronwall 1 = 6 different players, 14 rings.
Any "loss" in leadership in you might perceive in Oveckin and Thornton is more than made up by the leadership and hockey IQ by other players our team possesses.