You say the Cubs should act like a major market but then say they should just be pussies. The Cubs got on the green but 3 putted the hole. this past year. Alonso is set to get about 22M in Arb this year and will be 29 in December. Bellinger is 6 months younger, hits LH, and is already familiar with the team and area. Only way Alonso is better is injury history. You want to spend about 60M on 3 guys who would improve the team but 2 are short term and the other is a pending FA. I think if they are going to do that, might as well at least try for the big chips and put the team on a WS path for the next 4-6 seasons.
Soto - Trade for him w/o an extension, He cost lesser assets. Before the introductory presser (take some aspirin) offer a 17Y612M dollar contract with opt outs at years 4, 7, and 10. AAV is 36M. He would collect 391M through year 10 with pay outs set at 33/36/38/40 then 43/44/43 then 40/38/36 and finally 34/33/32/31/31/30/30.
Bellinger - Offer 8 years and 220 million with opt outs at year 4 and 6 paying 130M and 180M in total at them. 35/35/30/30/25/25/20/20.
If things go badly and they aren't happy, either can be out within 4 years and both contracts are structured so that they can leave after the age 34 seasons and make a final go somewhere else or ride out at lower than AAV payouts. Also remind each player that any Cali based team would have to offer 675M and 245M to just beat the deals offered once you consider state income tax and a NY based team would have to offer 705M and 255M for the same reasons. Then it's a question of do they care more about the paycheck number or what's going into the actual bank account.
Combine with my previous posts and you have a team spending like a major market, hoping it's wise, and contending. Otherwise, you're just hoping for a repeat of 15-17 while avoiding the surrounding years.
Lets start with the basics.
1. Soto is a outfielder. The Cubs will not need one for a while.
2. Bellinger will cost closer to 30M AAV than 20M AAV. He would have to play 1B which will lower his market value than CF.
So in reality he could walk away closer to 300M due to his age and marketability as a CF. This is not a reach with the Yankee's in on him.
3. 3B is not addressed at all.
So this is what you are proposing:
1. Add another OF because it is cool to stock pile on top of the stock pile.
2. Force Cody to take less cash and a lesser role going forward.
3. Keep 3B in twirl a whirl and hope hitters forget it exists when swinging.
Sounds about right.
Like I said. The best method is to target a 3B and a 1B and retain a SH that plays both. This give a true rotation for the DH. This has been talked about on MLTR and other resources as David's preferred scenario for the DH. Morel was supposed to be that guy but the glove was not good enough to pull it off. And it forced David into a stationary DH which is not what he preferred to use. Not to mention it is pointless to waste a roster spot to a non position player. Those days are gone and not the DH is utilized as a pivot for giving semi off days and keeps the bench more utilized. 2022 was the catcher rotation that gave needed rest and extra PA to Wilson. That led to a career year.
I see Morel traded. This has been talked about on the Atlantic for a while. Morel has decent value right now. So the iron is hot so it is time to strike. Teams will see him as raw potential and cheap. TBH he could blow up next year and to a team with a opening at 2B it would end up as a steal.
Alonso we really don't know what his final year will net. He made 14.5M last year so a trade plus extension would nix that. He will be 29 next year. He is a Boras guy but Boras has done extensions. `I believe that he could get 240-260M but for a 40+ HR bat it is justified.
Bellinger's value decreases as a full time 1B as his raw power is not at that level. It is a simple fact. His value is due to him in a premium position and at that position his power being top end. At 1B or a corner OF he falls in the pack.