Coach Q

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
Where be the haters now? He owned Boudreau, getting the matchups he wanted in the Honda Center all night.

Give it up for your future HOF head coach.

giphy.gif
 

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
59,642
Liked Posts:
52,595
If i get banned, imma respawn as maxwellpolish.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,098
Liked Posts:
19,163
Where be the haters now? He owned Boudreau, getting the matchups he wanted in the Honda Center all night.

Give it up for your future HOF head coach.

giphy.gif

I can never understand people looking for an argument/fight where there isn't one.

Haters?

Quenneville?

Give it up, strawman.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Where be the haters now? He owned Boudreau, getting the matchups he wanted in the Honda Center all night.

Give it up for your future HOF head coach.

giphy.gif

We're all grateful he pulled his head out of his ass, stopped scratching Vermette and TT, matched Toews vs. Getzlaf instead of Kesler, and put Kane and Toews together. Like most people were asking for....the entire series.

"He owned Boudreau" isn't exactly high praise, either. Only TWO teams in the history of the NHL have lost game 7, at home, three seasons in a row. Both were coached by Boudreau. He's probably getting fired again before next season, to boot....

I always love these posts praising Q for, once again, doing what everyone was asking him to do all along.

Let's see if he can continue to use common sense in the TB series before sucking his dick, shall we?
 

MaryChristine

Guest
We're all grateful he pulled his head out of his ass, stopped scratching Vermette and TT, matched Toews vs. Getzlaf instead of Kesler, and put Kane and Toews together. Like most people were asking for....the entire series.

"He owned Boudreau" isn't exactly high praise, either. Only TWO teams in the history of the NHL have lost game 7, at home, three seasons in a row. Both were coached by Boudreau. He's probably getting fired again before next season, to boot....

I always love these posts praising Q for, once again, doing what everyone was asking him to do all along.

Let's see if he can continue to use common sense in the TB series before sucking his dick, shall we?

player hater.
 

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
Yeah, Pez may be the only one here, but he is one of many on HFBoards. "Q is an idiot", "They win in spite of him, or only when he does what *I* say he should do*, "All he does is hold the door open".

It's armchair arrogance at it's finest, and complete bollocks.
 

Tjodalv

Discoverer of Dragosaurs
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
16,062
Liked Posts:
13,668
Still convinced Boudreau is actually Chef Boyardee sans mustache.

20111201-184222-pic-625506457.jpg

boyardee.jpg
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Yeah, Pez may be the only one here, but he is one of many on HFBoards. "Q is an idiot", "They win in spite of him, or only when he does what *I* say he should do*, "All he does is hold the door open".

It's armchair arrogance at it's finest, and complete bollocks.

Well it's a good thing we aren't the HFBoards then, isn't it?

I was one of the people loudly complaining about Q's roster moves in Game 3. It's the one weakness of his, in my mind. Every now and then he just does something that's completely fucking baffling with the lineup. But that weakness alone does not mean I think he's a bad coach. Sometimes I'd just like to inquire as to what the **** he is thinking about a particular infatuation with a player (See: Versteeg, Handzus, Bollig, etc.)
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
We're all grateful he pulled his head out of his ass, stopped scratching Vermette and TT, matched Toews vs. Getzlaf instead of Kesler, and put Kane and Toews together. Like most people were asking for....the entire series.

"He owned Boudreau" isn't exactly high praise, either. Only TWO teams in the history of the NHL have lost game 7, at home, three seasons in a row. Both were coached by Boudreau. He's probably getting fired again before next season, to boot....

I always love these posts praising Q for, once again, doing what everyone was asking him to do all along.

Let's see if he can continue to use common sense in the TB series before sucking his dick, shall we?

How's Jeremy Morin doing? You were begging for him to be played too. And the next playoff game Pirri ever plays, will be his first ever as a professional. You were sucking their dicks too. You claim that Roszival, Timonen and Runblad aren't even NHL defenceman - so Q has lead his team to the Cup with only 4 NHL defencemen. Let alone the claim Bickell is useless - so only 11 forwards. Not bad coaching a team that short handed.

But I digress. Game 2 went about 6 hours, and less than 48 hours later they had another game. Kruger was hurt. I'm pretty sure the coaches/team were the only ones that will know how bad. With him being a question mark to play let alone finish game 3 - he inserted Nordstrom (who can kill penalties) and Versteeg who can play any 3 forward position. If something happened with Kruger going down - the team had more options than Vermette and TT who only play 5 on 5 (Vermette had 1g in the playoffs up to that point). And the Hawks had just played 9 periods of hockey with what, 2 ES goal? And the fact is - they didn't lose the game because of the line up but the fact the Hawks went 0 for 5 on the PP was the reason they lost that game - including 8min on the PP in the first period.

None of us have any idea of injuries, matchups, or the makeup of the locker room and what the team needs. Q/the Hawks have an uncanny ability to understand it's a playoff series - not a playoff game. The fact that he is 40-14 record from game 4-7 in his Hawk coaching career would lead some smart people to understand he has shown the ability to have the pulse of the team as well as the other team, make adjustments to win.

While ever move made doesn't always work, the majority of them have been pretty successful. So you're not impressed he outcoached Boudreau on the road in a gm7 conference final, not impressed with 5 conf finals in 7 years, or the 2 cups he's won here, or his playoff record....at this point there's nothing the guy will do that you will like. Everyone gets it.

So who do you want coaching this team? Have a solution. Give a name of the perfect NHL coach other than you that will run the team perfectly the way you want.

Someone that never loses
Someone that never shuffles lineups - either between games or during games
Someone that plays the rookies/unproven players at all times regardless of mistakes

Give me that coach's names that will appease you.
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
48,108
Liked Posts:
26,618
How's Jeremy Morin doing? You were begging for him to be played too. And the next playoff game Pirri ever plays, will be his first ever as a professional. You were sucking their dicks too. You claim that Roszival, Timonen and Runblad aren't even NHL defenceman - so Q has lead his team to the Cup with only 4 NHL defencemen. Let alone the claim Bickell is useless - so only 11 forwards. Not bad coaching a team that short handed.

But I digress. Game 2 went about 6 hours, and less than 48 hours later they had another game. Kruger was hurt. I'm pretty sure the coaches/team were the only ones that will know how bad. With him being a question mark to play let alone finish game 3 - he inserted Nordstrom (who can kill penalties) and Versteeg who can play any 3 forward position. If something happened with Kruger going down - the team had more options than Vermette and TT who only play 5 on 5 (Vermette had 1g in the playoffs up to that point). And the Hawks had just played 9 periods of hockey with what, 2 ES goal? And the fact is - they didn't lose the game because of the line up but the fact the Hawks went 0 for 5 on the PP was the reason they lost that game - including 8min on the PP in the first period.

None of us have any idea of injuries, matchups, or the makeup of the locker room and what the team needs. Q/the Hawks have an uncanny ability to understand it's a playoff series - not a playoff game. The fact that he is 40-14 record from game 4-7 in his Hawk coaching career would lead some smart people to understand he has shown the ability to have the pulse of the team as well as the other team, make adjustments to win.

While ever move made doesn't always work, the majority of them have been pretty successful. So you're not impressed he outcoached Boudreau on the road in a gm7 conference final, not impressed with 5 conf finals in 7 years, or the 2 cups he's won here, or his playoff record....at this point there's nothing the guy will do that you will like. Everyone gets it.

So who do you want coaching this team? Have a solution. Give a name of the perfect NHL coach other than you that will run the team perfectly the way you want.

Someone that never loses
Someone that never shuffles lineups - either between games or during games
Someone that plays the rookies/unproven players at all times regardless of mistakes

Give me that coach's names that will appease you.

Anyone got a GIF good enough for this magnitude of ownage?
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
How's Jeremy Morin doing? You were begging for him to be played too. And the next playoff game Pirri ever plays, will be his first ever as a professional. You were sucking their dicks too. You claim that Roszival, Timonen and Runblad aren't even NHL defenceman - so Q has lead his team to the Cup with only 4 NHL defencemen. Let alone the claim Bickell is useless - so only 11 forwards. Not bad coaching a team that short handed.

But I digress. Game 2 went about 6 hours, and less than 48 hours later they had another game. Kruger was hurt. I'm pretty sure the coaches/team were the only ones that will know how bad. With him being a question mark to play let alone finish game 3 - he inserted Nordstrom (who can kill penalties) and Versteeg who can play any 3 forward position. If something happened with Kruger going down - the team had more options than Vermette and TT who only play 5 on 5 (Vermette had 1g in the playoffs up to that point). And the Hawks had just played 9 periods of hockey with what, 2 ES goal? And the fact is - they didn't lose the game because of the line up but the fact the Hawks went 0 for 5 on the PP was the reason they lost that game - including 8min on the PP in the first period.

None of us have any idea of injuries, matchups, or the makeup of the locker room and what the team needs. Q/the Hawks have an uncanny ability to understand it's a playoff series - not a playoff game. The fact that he is 40-14 record from game 4-7 in his Hawk coaching career would lead some smart people to understand he has shown the ability to have the pulse of the team as well as the other team, make adjustments to win.

While ever move made doesn't always work, the majority of them have been pretty successful. So you're not impressed he outcoached Boudreau on the road in a gm7 conference final, not impressed with 5 conf finals in 7 years, or the 2 cups he's won here, or his playoff record....at this point there's nothing the guy will do that you will like. Everyone gets it.

So who do you want coaching this team? Have a solution. Give a name of the perfect NHL coach other than you that will run the team perfectly the way you want.

Someone that never loses
Someone that never shuffles lineups - either between games or during games
Someone that plays the rookies/unproven players at all times regardless of mistakes

Give me that coach's names that will appease you.

icDAkh.jpg
 

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
Well it's a good thing we aren't the HFBoards then, isn't it?

Yeah, they perma-banned me, otherwise I would have dropped my mic over there.

:nana:

I was one of the people loudly complaining about Q's roster moves in Game 3. It's the one weakness of his, in my mind. Every now and then he just does something that's completely fucking baffling with the lineup. But that weakness alone does not mean I think he's a bad coach. Sometimes I'd just like to inquire as to what the **** he is thinking about a particular infatuation with a player (See: Versteeg, Handzus, Bollig, etc.)

Yup, agreed - it's a weakness. I don't understand it, either.

There are people, however, who focus only on his weaknesses and think there is some perfect coach who could replace him and win 2-3 more cups than Q has by not doing those things he does that piss them off. Some suggest Babcock, who hasn't been in a conference final since 2009 and has a similar penchant for playing vets. One guy actually said he could do the job and with a straight face said he would come back and solicit advice on the message board.

:lmao:

"OK, hit the ice. I'll be back with my lines as soon as I check my Twitter feed."
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
How's Jeremy Morin doing? You were begging for him to be played too. And the next playoff game Pirri ever plays, will be his first ever as a professional. You were sucking their dicks too. You claim that Roszival, Timonen and Runblad aren't even NHL defenceman - so Q has lead his team to the Cup with only 4 NHL defencemen. Let alone the claim Bickell is useless - so only 11 forwards. Not bad coaching a team that short handed.

But I digress. Game 2 went about 6 hours, and less than 48 hours later they had another game. Kruger was hurt. I'm pretty sure the coaches/team were the only ones that will know how bad. With him being a question mark to play let alone finish game 3 - he inserted Nordstrom (who can kill penalties) and Versteeg who can play any 3 forward position. If something happened with Kruger going down - the team had more options than Vermette and TT who only play 5 on 5 (Vermette had 1g in the playoffs up to that point). And the Hawks had just played 9 periods of hockey with what, 2 ES goal? And the fact is - they didn't lose the game because of the line up but the fact the Hawks went 0 for 5 on the PP was the reason they lost that game - including 8min on the PP in the first period.

None of us have any idea of injuries, matchups, or the makeup of the locker room and what the team needs. Q/the Hawks have an uncanny ability to understand it's a playoff series - not a playoff game. The fact that he is 40-14 record from game 4-7 in his Hawk coaching career would lead some smart people to understand he has shown the ability to have the pulse of the team as well as the other team, make adjustments to win.

While ever move made doesn't always work, the majority of them have been pretty successful. So you're not impressed he outcoached Boudreau on the road in a gm7 conference final, not impressed with 5 conf finals in 7 years, or the 2 cups he's won here, or his playoff record....at this point there's nothing the guy will do that you will like. Everyone gets it.

So who do you want coaching this team? Have a solution. Give a name of the perfect NHL coach other than you that will run the team perfectly the way you want.

Someone that never loses
Someone that never shuffles lineups - either between games or during games
Someone that plays the rookies/unproven players at all times regardless of mistakes

Give me that coach's names that will appease you.

Right on queue. You're such a fucking dumb ass Q apologist, you will defend any decision he makes. He could scratch Keith and Toews and you would find some way to justify it. I never sucked Morin's dick. I just said he was a better option than Versteeg and Bolling in the playoffs. And he was. His obsession with Handzus was inexcusible as well. Same story there. Not a fan of Pirri at all but he was a better option than Handzus. The 0-5 PP is all on the players, right? Has nothing to do with setup or personnel... Certainly not Q's fault...

Cumiskey is an NHL defenseman, so the Hawks have 5. It doesn't matter anyway. Q had 6 NHL defensemen last season and still hardly played them. It's just how he does things come playoff time.

There is no better coach available. Still doesn't mean he is above reproach or criticism. Just like the players.

We get it. Q is amazing. When the Hawks win it is because of his great coaching. When they lose it is all on the players. Except it doesn't work that way. He can lose games with his decisions just like the players can. Like he did in game 3. Some games coaching wins or loses the game. Others, the players win or lose the games.

What is Q doing that is so amazing? He got the best of Boudreau in game 7. Of that there is no doubt. But shouldn't we expect that? Boudreau fucking sucks.
 

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,555
Liked Posts:
7,576
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
When he flipped out in the middle of this series and called two timeouts to yell at his players for 5 minutes straight I saw something interesting.....

Teuvo went on a rampage for 1.5 games. He was playing scared!! The vets might have shrugged off the tirade and played there hockey, but I tell you Teuvo came out for several periods like a gun was to his head and he was on cocaine. Just flying around and the fastest object on the ice, it helped he had sat out a game, but it seemed like it was the Q shouting that freaking lit a fire under him. To be expected when a big mean scary veteran of the game is screaming at a 19 year old who hasn't even had high level professional coaching at the eliteist level beyond Q. Probably that was the biggest ass ripping by a coach he has ever experienced. I laughed real hard. Kid was scared into becoming the best player on the ice.
 

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
59,642
Liked Posts:
52,595
Right on queue. You're such a fucking dumb ass Q apologist, you will defend any decision he makes. He could scratch Keith and Toews and you would find some way to justify it. I never sucked Morin's dick. I just said he was a better option than Versteeg and Bolling in the playoffs. And he was. His obsession with Handzus was inexcusible as well. Same story there. Not a fan of Pirri at all but he was a better option than Handzus. The 0-5 PP is all on the players, right? Has nothing to do with setup or personnel... Certainly not Q's fault...

Cumiskey is an NHL defenseman, so the Hawks have 5. It doesn't matter anyway. Q had 6 NHL defensemen last season and still hardly played them. It's just how he does things come playoff time.

There is no better coach available. Still doesn't mean he is above reproach or criticism. Just like the players.

We get it. Q is amazing. When the Hawks win it is because of his great coaching. When they lose it is all on the players. Except it doesn't work that way. He can lose games with his decisions just like the players can. Like he did in game 3. Some games coaching wins or loses the game. Others, the players win or lose the games.

What is Q doing that is so amazing? He got the best of Boudreau in game 7. Of that there is no doubt. But shouldn't we expect that? Boudreau fucking sucks.

HOW MANY CUP RINGS DOES Q NEED BEFORE YOU BOW DOWN TO HIS BRILLIANCE???


SRS, WAT DA FUQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


i
 

Top