Coaching /GM Interview Tracker (Liam Coen is a Jag, Pirate Pete is a Raider, Cowboys hired a guy)

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,177
Liked Posts:
19,252

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
36,154
Liked Posts:
11,252
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
100.webp
 

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,629
Liked Posts:
9,292
Location:
Laughing at Tom Brady
Allen down to the Bears and Lions then?

Just a guess on my part but I wonder if they have a handshake deal that Ben gets Allen (needs him more) but won’t poach any coach off the offensive staff. It’s really weird that Ben hasn’t tried to bring anyone in while Glen is bringing at least 2 people with him.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,815
Liked Posts:
40,765
so your in your vortex already? I said accomplishments not development. Goff just finished his 9th year.. the development stage ended years ago. I never said he developed Goff, nor did I say that Monken developed LJ.. Stop with the strawman arguments. The only thing I ever said about developing a QB was that McCarthy was the only one who actually developed a QB.. but that was a different debate about why I liked MaCarthy more then both TM and BJ. This debate that I guess spun you up for some strange reason was because I said TM was less of a risk then BJ.
Whether you are talking development or accomplishmeng the point is it is irrelevant because I never claimed Goff wasnt accomplished. I simply told you Monken had talented QBs he worked with. So did Johnson.
No your comparison is completely dumb because in your analogy one was about an athlete where the physical attributes fade quickly with age compared to a coach where the mental attributes do not. its dumb, its a bad analogy.
The comparison wasnt about physical attributes. It was about when a franchise gives someone a chance. Monken has coached for 30 years and no NFL team has ever given him a chance to be a head coach. That means they dont consider him ready.
Cool so you just made my point.. nice work
Not really as no one cares who you consider risky as you are a nobody.
Some people can look at the information available and come to their own conclusions, others need to be told how to think.. apparently you need the NFL to tell you how to think.
Your conclusions dont matter. Maybe you can get Monken to be the Head Coach and OC for your Madden team but the only opinion that really matters here is the NFL as they are the only ones that can hire him and they are saying doing so is risky hence why he doesnt have a job.
 

RubberBanMan

I’m just a fan
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2018
Posts:
3,134
Liked Posts:
3,250
Assuming Coen gets hired, it's going to make for some interesting GM dynamics. Who is really going to be in charge and reporting to whom?

Is a good GM really going to want to go to the Jags when you have a young, unproven coach with apparently a direct line to the owner? And you potentially have a very overpaid, average QB?
That’s ian cunningham’s music!
 

Bears4Ever_34

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
14,482
Liked Posts:
11,223
Damn…. Lmaooooo
I went in to this coaching cycle thinking only the Jets were a more dysfunctional organization than the Bears, but Jacksonville and Las Vegas are proving me wrong. What an embarrassment. Coen getting paid as much as Johnson is laughable.
 

Top