SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,533
- Liked Posts:
- 7,266
You'd have a point if this year was the only year that mattered. And the "factually incorrect" thing i posted was from the same article YOU just linked.
You're brushing off a 5.5 m cap savings for the following season like that wouldn't play a part in their decision.
They took a dead cap hit but that doesn't come close to what they're saving over the remainder of his contract.
How am I brushing it off when I literally said they traded him to clear the money off of next years books???? Did you not read that I wrote that before you even realized it??? Just scroll up and read the point I made again, and realize I mid this point before you did. You were the one that was trying to convince me they were saving money this year and now you have completely pivoted because you were wrong and you didn't know there was a dead cap hit, and that has been proven because you linked multiple posts stating there was a 4 million dollar savings this year. I didn't share that part of the article because I knew about the dead money.
Now that we both understand and agree they did it to save money for next year., the point you are now unwilling to have any conversation about is how the Bills viewed Bates. Paying 4 million for a starting caliber guard than can also play center in a pinch is not that much money, particularly considering what the top level players have been signing for the last few years.
However, 4 million dollars for a BACK UP is insanely expensive, and this is why they wanted the money off the books. Bates was not in the Bills plans to be a starter, and so he was moved for a 5th round pick. Yes, he was moved to clear money off of NEXT years books, even though the Bills had an insane crunch this year, he was moved because 4 million for a guy to sit on the bench is not good money.