CSF77
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 18,667
- Liked Posts:
- 2,845
- Location:
- San Diego
Talent was the issue. If he were worthy of playing time he would have gotten playing time. As for no opportunity the guy has 718 PAs in the majors and has hit .229/.309/.329. You want to trade a PTBNL and give him a shot in camp to "change scene"? Fine. But you're handing not only lead off but a starting position at 2B where the cubs have multiple options already to a career .229 hitter with a .309 OBP. Just because he was once a #1 prospect doesn't mean anything. Ok so he hit in AAA last year but it was the PCL and everyone hits in the PCL. You're talking about a guy who has very low power and who hasn't hit for a high average even in the minors. He's hit .279 in the minors over 2151 PAs and texas' farm teams all play in hitter friendly environments.
I wouldn't give up anything of value for him. You want to trade Zagunis and hope for the best fine but the guys not worth any real prospect in his current form.
They would have to create playing time to make it worth it. And I agree that you would have to trade lower value. I’m thinking Butler myself.
But to create that playing time it would have to be in the aftermath of a trade to get a SP. most likely Baez and or Happ would be gone and Zobrist would be left alone.
I honestly believe it will cost 2 of Baez/Happ/Schwarber to acquire a controlled TOR pitcher. And Theo pretty much said that they are out of the business of selling long term control for 1 year of control. That stuff made sense going into a WS drought. Soler was a offload. Any other buy would have control attached to it.
Edit: as far as the lead off I’m down with resigning Jay and platooning him and Almora. Then let Profar start at 2B batting #9. Ya back to that but opens up more RBI’s for Bryant. After that Zobrist goes back to 6th man and his numbers suggest a age regression. It makes sense to use him and Profar to give days off at 3B and SS