- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,855
- Liked Posts:
- 9,048
Bryant is actually K'ing at a higher rate then Baez now.
Bryant is actually K'ing at a higher rate then Baez now.
Javier Baez finding a new home at a new position
A shortstop his entire career, Baez moved to the other side of the infield last week and made his regular season debut at second base.
That's where Baez was on Monday during Iowa's 5-4 loss to the New Orleans Zephyrs before 5,088 fans at Principal Park. And it's where he could be for most of the second half of the season.
"(He'll play there) the majority of the time," Iowa manager Marty Pevey said.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...ago-cubs-iowa-cubs-baseball-america/12973251/
So who is still sticking with the notion that Baez will be moving to 3B for the Cubs?
I guess we will see. But Pierce Johnson had more upside at the time he was included in the list. He has settled into that middle of the rotation starter profile as his fastball velocity rests more in the same area as Tseng.And most guys in the 50 range of top 100 lists as pitchers are 2/3 pitchers. I fail to see the point you're making here. My point was that he could be a pitcher in the 50-75 range in a top 100. Pierce Johnson was #80 in mlb.com's rankings before the season and was viewed as a #3 starter. Edwards was viewed as a possibly a 2 and more likely a 3 if he stays in the rotation at around the 40's on various lists.
So, again I'm not sure what your disagreement is here. My original statement was that Tseng would skyrocket up lists which I later clarified meant around the 50 range in top 100 lists. Going from not even a top 5 IFA in 2013 in most people's mind to that range would be a pretty dramatic movement in a year.
Cubs number 1 farm system in baseball! WHOO!!!
Source?
Keith Law, I believe.
I guess we will see. But Pierce Johnson had more upside at the time he was included in the list. He has settled into that middle of the rotation starter profile as his fastball velocity rests more in the same area as Tseng.
I would be pleasantly surprised if Tseng cracked Baseball America's top 100 list. BP I could see because he has been getting a lot love out of the BP crew, but I am guessing he is on the cusp and not solidly in the top 100 like you've been saying. And again it has to do with the upside. I get that you love command in pitchers, but guys with electric stuff are going to be prioritized on these lists until Tseng does what he is doing in the high minors at a young age.
Well like I've said, opinions vary. Fundamentally it's difficult for me as someone who's more into stats than scouting to see a player like Tseng with a mid 8 k/9 and a sub 1.5 bb/9 and think that there's many pitching prospects that rate that much higher. I understand what you're saying about that but I just think the idea is kind of flawed. Again to bring up someone like Aaron Sanchez, you have to buy into the idea that something will change with him because he's not had a sub 3.50 ERA above AA and even his K's have been in the 7 range with pretty horrendous walk rates.
Keith Law, I believe.
I understand the approach you take I just don't agree with it completely either. I think statistics below AA are virtually meaningless. They do not inform us beyond the scouting of the player. Once players hit that level then I start to pay a bit more attention. Now that is my personal feelings on the subject but many people have expressed ideas that follow the logic that stats become more meaningful as you reach MLB.
Should also point out that what I was arguing was the odds that he ends up on a list, particularly Baseball America that is notoriously scout heavy in terms of approach, and not my personal feelings about Tseng.
Soler to AAA. Almora to AA. Woohoo!