beckdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,750
- Liked Posts:
- 3,741
wtf
Sent from my Rotary Phone using Tapatalk
I'm talking about a #3 or #4 prospect for most teams for a starting OF who's making next to nothing. We're talking about someone who's at best likely to be slightly above average for Schierholtz who was roughly an average MLB outfielder last year. What's the problem? I mean for god sake we've literally listened to months of people on this board bitching about how unreliable prospects are. What's the point in trading him for anything less than that? It's not like he's making some large some of money that he they need to move him. Are you suggesting they should trade him for a matt szczur who's a 4th/5th OF who's not even in the majors yet? I mean I'm not suggesting they can get an all star player for him or even a future all star but his season last year was comparable to Cespedis(.240/.294/.442 26 HRs 74 runs 80 RBIs 7 SB vs .251/.301/.470 21 HRs 56 runs 68 RBIs 6 SB). Cespedis is making substantially more money and admittedly he has a higher upside but the fact remains Schierholtz was a very solid player last season. Trumbo has more power but if you compare the two's triple slash you have .234/.294/.453 for Trumbo who was essentially worth Adam Eaton and Tyler Skaggs. Is it that hard to believe Schierholtz is worth a Skaggs level prospect?