Cuts Thread

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
35,587
Liked Posts:
11,028
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
He made a 57 yarder last night Kaare Vedvik, and he can punt too.

Isn't like $9 mil of Parkey's contract guaranteed? Didn't the guy make a pro bowl like 2-3 years ago?
 

Mdbearz

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 9, 2014
Posts:
4,519
Liked Posts:
3,133
Location:
Harford County, MD
Isn't like $9 mil of Parkey's contract guaranteed? Didn't the guy make a pro bowl like 2-3 years ago?

The Ravens had no reason to bring in competition for Tucker, but they did. Not sure why we did not bring in a second kicker. What if Parkey had gotten hurt or sucked, oh wait..
 

Bears_804

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,754
Liked Posts:
1,383
Have all of his missed field goals been from 47+?
No, but most. He lacks long range ability apparently. That'll lose you some games, especially in CHI with the wind. He hit the uprights on a 36 yarder last night I believe.
 

Monster

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,848
Liked Posts:
8,494
AZ has a rookie and Dawson...
The kicking makes me nervous.
 

D.J. Moore

The Member
Joined:
Mar 22, 2016
Posts:
1,118
Liked Posts:
1,322
Location:
South Bend IN
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Have we signed Fox as our challenge flag thrower yet?
 

greg23

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 28, 2014
Posts:
9,963
Liked Posts:
5,572
Sorry, but 8 receptions in 3 years brings ZERO to the receiving table.

Once you take out the receiving from the FB title, all that is left is blocking.

So who has more experience in blocking a starting lineman in college or a starting FB in college?

The easy answer is that a starting lineman in college has many more chances to block than a starting fullback in college.

Who has more chances of blocking in the pros?

This one becomes a little more interesting because a backup lineman only will block when someone in front of him is injured while a starting FB is used rarely.



I honestly would rather use the spot for another TE, OLB or CB. However, if the Bears decide that they need someone to be the battering ram in front of the HB, don´t be stuck with the notion that a Clutts or Burton would be better than someone who has played as an offensive lineman all his life, be it Grasu or any athletic lineman the Bears can find.

Quick question: What will happen the next time that Mike Burton catches a football in an NFL game?





Answer: The career receptions for Tyler Clutts + the career receptions for Mike Burton will equal 20 receptions, not each ... total.

STFU and stop doubling down about your stupid ass idea if grassu being our new fb starting tomorrow.
 

reggie_love

Active member
Joined:
Mar 28, 2016
Posts:
400
Liked Posts:
129
Sorry, but 8 receptions in 3 years brings ZERO to the receiving table.

Once you take out the receiving from the FB title, all that is left is blocking.

So who has more experience in blocking a starting lineman in college or a starting FB in college?

The easy answer is that a starting lineman in college has many more chances to block than a starting fullback in college.

Who has more chances of blocking in the pros?

This one becomes a little more interesting because a backup lineman only will block when someone in front of him is injured while a starting FB is used rarely.



I honestly would rather use the spot for another TE, OLB or CB. However, if the Bears decide that they need someone to be the battering ram in front of the HB, don´t be stuck with the notion that a Clutts or Burton would be better than someone who has played as an offensive lineman all his life, be it Grasu or any athletic lineman the Bears can find.

Quick question: What will happen the next time that Mike Burton catches a football in an NFL game?





Answer: The career receptions for Tyler Clutts + the career receptions for Mike Burton will equal 20 receptions, not each ... total.

This is idiotic. Its the NFL not 8th grade. the only reason to keep someone as a 4th back who isnt a traditional fullback would be because they can do multiple things eg Nall. Grasu is not going to play as a C so you'd be keeping someone who sucks as a lineman and has never played FB. It makes no sense. And even using your idiotic logic, Burton's 8 catches is more than Grasu's 0 so wouldn't that make him a better receiver? dumb
 

Mitchapalooza

Guest
Something about old skool battering rams.

lincoln-renall-battering-ram-14b.jpg
 

Top