- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 18,546
- Liked Posts:
- 4,613
And you're basing this on what??? Because he was injured last year??? If so that's idiotic.
Dude, it was a joke, a little sensitive are we?
And you're basing this on what??? Because he was injured last year??? If so that's idiotic.
Because they only run when inside the 20? So the 97 yard play doesn't count? Big plays win games. Discounting them is loser talk.
Dude, it was a joke, a little sensitive are we?
AB was covered by a helping safety a lot in that game. Which left JuJu wide open all game long
I'm not sensitive at all. How exactly am I supposed to know that's a joke? The demeanor you had when you typed it? When people use sarcasm on here they type it in green font or it's obvious. That was neither. And you most definitely shouldn't be calling anyone else on this board sensitive. When there's any criticism about the Lions on here you get all butthurt about, even when it's justified.
Got it....use more smileys
And I don't get butt hurt about justified criticism of the Lions, and yes there is plenty.
Arob will be on IR time the Lions game rolls around though..........Juju Smith-Schuster was a beast that game, but his stat line is greatly inflated by a one play 97 yard catch and run. Lions got stuffed in the redzone 3 times for zero points in a 15-20 loss, largley do to their enemic run game.
Never a good sign when you have to bank on the other team's injuries in order to win.
I don't buy it. You act more butthurt in this thread than Jim Caldwell in the dungeon of doom.
And you've also shown your true colors about your supposed Bear fandom....
Dude, it was a joke, a little sensitive are we?
Got it....use more smileys
And I don't get butt hurt about justified criticism of the Lions, and yes there is plenty.
Loser talk is not understanding what was said before posting a stupid comment. What part of JuJu was a beast that game did you fail to understand exactly?
FWIW...I thought it was funny. Seems that Bears Football is more serious business than you would think looking at the Wins column this decade.
Great D and Cousins > Keenum. That is what people are saying in June...…………Could be a whole different story in Jan. I could be wrong but I don't think there has been a repeat division winner in the NFC in at least the last three years, so crowning Minny's ass in June just might be a tad early.I know i'm still on page 1 here but can anyone explain to me what's going on with Minnesota that we are expected to get rolled this season? I'll concede to Aaron Rodgers until we prove otherwise but while I will acknowledge the Vikings have burnt our ass up since 2014, the games have always seemed competitive.
Great D and Cousins > Keenum. That is what people are saying in June...…………Could be a whole different story in Jan. I could be wrong but I don't think there has been a repeat division winner in the NFC in at least the last three years, so crowning Minny's ass in June just might be a tad early.
Dude your Lions are getting swept. And Green bay will probably be a win home and a loss away. Willing to bet if you are?
Great D and Cousins > Keenum. That is what people are saying in June...…………Could be a whole different story in Jan. I could be wrong but I don't think there has been a repeat division winner in the NFC in at least the last three years, so crowning Minny's ass in June just might be a tad early.
Apples to oranges, while you are looking at a single division I am looking at recent NFC history. Looking back to the last Chicago division championship you have had at least three new NFC teams in the playoffs every year with the exception of the of the 2014 season which appears to be the outlier. The Pack is the only team to dominate their division in that NFC timeframe. I do not assume anything about recent historical NFC data.Of course it's early. Way to ignore the breakdown analyses of the differences between Cousins and Keenum in stats and defense reading and mindset when under pressure.
oh well.
But are you honestly suggesting that your analysis of most likely North champion this season is based on a trend of 3 previous years? That you would take the "anyone-but-Minnesota" because Minnesota won last year and you think there is some kind of force in the universe out there allowing no repeat champs in the NFC North for the last 3 years and you also assume that this same force is governing the North by the same rules this season as the last 3??
Apples to oranges, while you are looking at a single division I am looking at recent NFC history. Looking back to the last Chicago division championship you have had at least three new NFC teams in the playoffs every year with the exception of the of the 2014 season which appears to be the outlier. The Pack is the only team to dominate their division in that NFC timeframe. I do not assume anything about recent historical NFC data.
Cousins...……..still not a fan. He has to prove he can win big games, and beating teams with winning records. In three years as the starter in Washington I believe he has a losing division record. Bottom line is winning and he has not done it yet. It's not like he did not have some talent in Washington especially in 2015 and 2016. Take that '16 season for example two WR's over a 1,000 yards in Garcon and Jackson, while Crower was at 847 in the slot, TE's Reed/Davis combining for 110 receptions and over 1,200 yards. A solid run game with Kelly/Jones/ Thompson. Not to mention a more than solid OL led by Pro-Bowl players Scherff and Williams. More than enough talent to make the playoffs that year, and Cousins leads his team to a 8-7-1 record. There is a reason Washington let him walk.
So if you want to crown Minny's ass go for it. Some of us would like to see the games played first.