- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
The word "best" being thrown around (on all sides of the argument) in this thread is very argumentative. And that's one thing that could be said against Hou's chances at being a good defense attorney.
There are some stats in which Rose is better. And there are some in which it's James. In some, it's a very debatable. Looking at the stats as a whole is even more debatable. And there is a much more complicated story behind every single stat. Some stats are somewhat overblown and some are very overlooked.
It seems that everybody is in agreement that James is most likely the easiest player to point to as the "best" overall player in the NBA. But everybody also seems to have come to the consensus that Rose deserves the MVP more than James this year, despite that.
A lot of us find Hou's style of debate pretty tiresome and sometimes he has the tendency to overlook a lot of substance made by people in previous posts... and he sometimes does jump to conclusions and assumes the worst about people's judgement.
I know I sure as hell don't agree with Glide when he said Rondo was a scrub. And he does see the game through the perspective of a true blue Bulls' fan. But all of us do to a certain point. And why should any of us hold that against him? He had some opinions that I feel like I agree with most of them in this thread that were negative about James. But he didn't call him a terrible player either.
I think we should try to start getting along now. Nobody in this thread is coming across like a blithering idiot. And we are all mostly on the same page anyway. Let's spare ourselves the drama.
There are some stats in which Rose is better. And there are some in which it's James. In some, it's a very debatable. Looking at the stats as a whole is even more debatable. And there is a much more complicated story behind every single stat. Some stats are somewhat overblown and some are very overlooked.
It seems that everybody is in agreement that James is most likely the easiest player to point to as the "best" overall player in the NBA. But everybody also seems to have come to the consensus that Rose deserves the MVP more than James this year, despite that.
A lot of us find Hou's style of debate pretty tiresome and sometimes he has the tendency to overlook a lot of substance made by people in previous posts... and he sometimes does jump to conclusions and assumes the worst about people's judgement.
I know I sure as hell don't agree with Glide when he said Rondo was a scrub. And he does see the game through the perspective of a true blue Bulls' fan. But all of us do to a certain point. And why should any of us hold that against him? He had some opinions that I feel like I agree with most of them in this thread that were negative about James. But he didn't call him a terrible player either.
I think we should try to start getting along now. Nobody in this thread is coming across like a blithering idiot. And we are all mostly on the same page anyway. Let's spare ourselves the drama.