- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 59,821
- Liked Posts:
- 38,434
Now, without Watson, we still obviously have to do all those things anyway... So this could be worth it knowing you have a top 10 QB. Possibly top 5 but I wouldn't go that far. If I was told that Watson would hold up for the next decade, this would be an easy trade.
As to whether he is top 5 or top 10. Watson had the 5th best passer rating under pressure (so makes OL better), 4th best when kept clean, 2nd best with play action, 3rd best without play action, 7th best when throwing under 2.5 seconds, 2nd best over 2.5 seconds, and 5th best throwing deep.
So you are talking about a QB that is virtually top 5 in every fucking category. You will never get another chance to get a QB like this again. People whined about not playing to 4M's strengths. 4M was 15th in the NFL with 104.8 rating on play action. Watson was 2nd with 131.2. When kept clean 4M had a rating of 95.6. Watson's was 121.
So Watson is vastly superior to 4M in the areas he is supposedly good at and then destroys 4M in the areas 4M struggles. 4M's passing rating throwing deep is 29.1. Watson's is 116.1. Think about what going from 29.1 to 116.1 means to a guy like Mooney given how Watson consistently found Hopkins and Fuller deep?