Do You think Fielder Is Coming To The Cubs?

[Rice Cube]

No. You are. I said that he relied on his legs for value(I didn't say how much). You said that it is not entirely true. Him relying on his legs for X amount of value is absolutely true. Him relying on his legs for all of his value would be false. But I didn't say that he relied on his legs for all of his value, did I?

He was technically right, as you have stated in this post. You are technically also right though one can see where your statements could be taken out of context or misconstrued as an absolute.

Your time is better spent not arguing about semantics :lol:

 

[FirstTimer]

He was technically right, as you have stated in this post. You are technically also right though one can see where your statements could be taken out of context or misconstrued as an absolute.

Your time is better spent not posting here.

Fixed.

 

[DewsSox79]

There is a huge difference between Fielder and Soriano.

A) Soriano relied on his legs for value.
B) Soriano was older. Fielder is only 27.
C) Fielder is a much better player than Soriano.

Let's all just relax and watch Theo do his thang.

which wont be spending money on fatty, but working on building the farm (developing young talent)

 

[tbo41fan]

which wont be spending money on fatty, but working on building the farm (developing young talent)

we prefer the term "big boned"

:lmao:

 

[Captain Obvious]

which wont be spending money on fatty, but working on building the farm (developing young talent)

Who is gonna get Fatty then? The Rangers?

If you paid any attention to the new CBA, you would know that the Cubs are not going to be able to spend ridiculous amounts of money on the draft, like they had the intention of. This means that they do have to focus on the MLB team more. And I am going to laugh so hard when the Cubs sign Fielder.

 

[WindyCity]

Who is gonna get Fatty then? The Rangers?

If you paid any attention to the new CBA, you would know that the Cubs are not going to be able to spend ridiculous amounts of money on the draft, like they had the intention of. This means that they do have to focus on the MLB team more. And I am going to laugh so hard when the Cubs sign Fielder.

The Darvish signing does make things better for the Cubs as I am assuming that the Rangers are now out.

As someone mentioned the market for Fielder must be slow and that is why we are hearing so much about it as Boras is looking to generate interest.

I hope that this is the case and now that the Rangers are out we see some movement in the Fielder market.

 

[Uman85]

With Texas likely out of the running for Fielder, it's really down to the Cubs and Mariners. Between the two of them, I really like the Cubs' chances unless some team comes out of nowhere and grabs him.

 

[brett05]

With Texas likely out of the running for Fielder, it's really down to the Cubs and Mariners. Between the two of them, I really like the Cubs' chances unless some team comes out of nowhere and grabs him.

I think it depends a lot on what's important to Fielder. If it's getting paid, I think it might be Seattle. If it's about winning then neither Seattle or the Cubs are contenders.

Let's take a look at sleepers from a winning perspective.

Giants - Need a big bat to compliment their great pitching. It all depends how they see Belt
Dodgers - Definitely could, but I don't see any cash there
Rockies - What a sleeper that would be. Helton's time has come to pass, Could they carry Helton for the year (assuming his option has been picked up)
Diamondbacks - Great fit on such a young team

Cardinals - Replaces Pujols, could be offered same contract that Albert turned down
Brewers - No one thinks he's coming back, that's a true sleeper right there
Reds - No need with Votto

Nationals - Morse came out of nowhere to hit 31 dingers last year but he'll be 30 on opening day. Could be the last veteran they need to be perennial contenders
Braves - Freeman is their guy for the future, no need
Phillies - Ryan was the first big signing at 1b, no need
Marlins - Man, crazy dollars there. They could jump in on it.

Yankees - Texeira, no real need there
Red Sox - Gonzales, no real need there
Rays - Another team that would be a great sleeper and make them on even par with the two big boys

Tigers - Miggy, enough said


Angels - Albert was their choice
A's - Would they be a contender with a bat like Prince?
Rangers - they just dropped a ton on Yu, but with Hamilton a FA after this season taking Fielder still seems like an option.

 

[Rice Cube]

I did a similar handicap as Brett and concluded that the most likely destinations are Seattle, Texas, the Cubs, and maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaybe Toronto.

Leverage against Prince Fielder is no easy task, but it’s there | World Series Dreaming

 

[tbo41fan]

Diamondbacks can't afford him

they dont sell tickets, not alot of revenue

 

[brett05]

The key seems to be is what type of a player is Fielder. A money won or a want to win. You can be both but it would seem only Texas and maybe the Giants fit that bill.

 

[Rice Cube]

The key seems to be is what type of a player is Fielder. A money won or a want to win. You can be both but it would seem only Texas and maybe the Giants fit that bill.

I think the Giants want to lock up their pitching, especially Lincecum and Cain. That leaves Texas.

I'm cool with Fielder going to Texas. GTFO the NL Central :lol:

 

[brett05]

See it kinda stinks for the Cubs too on the Free Agent market. Being so far away with a rebuild no guy that wants to win will come because by the time the Cubs could be winning, they'll be done with their contract or even unproductive if it is a longer term deal. So the players the Cubs get won't be "winners" but money hounds. Until they can build up the lower levels of the organization and make trades for quality youth it's going to be a while before the "winners" say, Yep, the Cubs can win and I am that missing piece.

 

[Rice Cube]

See it kinda stinks for the Cubs too on the Free Agent market. Being so far away with a rebuild no guy that wants to win will come because by the time the Cubs could be winning, they'll be done with their contract or even unproductive if it is a longer term deal. So the players the Cubs get won't be "winners" but money hounds. Until they can build up the lower levels of the organization and make trades for quality youth it's going to be a while before the "winners" say, Yep, the Cubs can win and I am that missing piece.

They can still make trades and international signings especially with money coming off the books. Sometimes the player will flock to whoever gives them the most money.

As long as "the most money" isn't more than six years or so for Fielder and not much more than $22MM per year I think I'm okay with it

 

[Cloud 9]

Don't get me wrong I'd love for Fielder to sign in Chicago, but I just don't feel like that's going to happen. I think Seattle makes sense for Prince if they can get the money right.

 

[Captain Obvious]

Don't get me wrong I'd love for Fielder to sign in Chicago, but I just don't feel like that's going to happen. I think Seattle makes sense for Prince if they can get the money right.

How does Seattle make sense for Prince? Seattle is in the same division as LA & Texas. They're going to be losing for many years to come.

 

[Cloud 9]

How does Seattle make sense for Prince? Seattle is in the same division as LA & Texas. They're going to be losing for many years to come.

Prince and Felix would be a pretty dominant start to a core, I think they would be able to give Texas and LA problems. That's of course if they could add some more talent.

 

[CODE_BLUE56]

For his size ther eis only so much you can do to keep wear and tear off your body. Especially your knees. I don't think Fielder is a slob or anything but it's just kind of the reality of the situation. Giving Fielder anything more than a 5 eyar deal IMO would be a mistake a really big risk.

he uses power more from his upperbody and weight than from a stride..he relies on his legs a little less

the way he swings helps him a bit

he has lost some weight as well..he used to be well above 300 now he's down to 270 or so...i think he should still lose a little more weight because he could still wear down with age...

the good news is that fielder doesnt have a history of injuries(in fact he's one of the more durable players in the MLB)..that doesnt mean the possibility of injuries in the future is out of question..but it does set a promising precedent

i agree with the idea of the shorter term deal but when you're dealing with a big time free agent...with the way the market works these days it seems..its hard to commit to a big time player for a short term contract...most of the time these high profile free agents look for big incentives or guarantee as well as looking to raise the bar on the market or exploit the typical high profile free agent price(which usually run from 5-10 years)

if we sign fielder...i doubt it'll be less than for a 5 year deal

 

[nwfisch]

How does Seattle make sense for Prince? Seattle is in the same division as LA & Texas. They're going to be losing for many years to come.

They could offer more money than the Cubs :tiptoe:

 

[EROCK23]

Unless Fielder signs a year deal I dont see it happening.

I think fielder and his agent are very dissapointed in the suitors that have been interested.

Seattle
Texas
Chicago

The #1 place where you can go with a huge baseball following would be chicago. You get to stay in the NL and be in a hitters park. Its just the Cubs are in rebulding mode and I wouldnt doubt they re-sign pena or go with Lahair. DO I wanna see prince in a cubbie uniform. HELL YES! But I dont think it will happen