1. He's not the coach, not a player, so using the W/L to describe his job feels forced to me. His job is handling the money. I don't hold my finance team accountable for what the project managers fail to do.
2. Suppose the record is on him - he spent his first year terminating the Pace failures and cutting bad contracts, and it takes more than one off-season to build back up. We all knew what that was at the time, and complaining about it now is reactionary, "sky is falling" territory in my eye. You can't empty a steel mill of workers and sell off the machinery, and then go on to wonder why it takes more than two years to get new workers and new machinery.
3. My personal opinion on grading him is heavily influenced by the this off-season and last off-season, where he did a whole lot right. I'm not here to complain about not firing Flus the year before (though it is what I would have done in his shoes) because who knows if we get Ben Johnson then; At best, we land Harbough. And I'm a fan of the new HC. It does appear to me that the team is in a much better position today than it was two years ago.
4. Maybe this is just me in my ivory tower, but acceptable grades start at B. Not B-, not C+ with extra credit and favorable rounding. Anything else and he's on the hot seat to be replaced this year, and that's not my read. If C is acceptable in your house then you can give him a C.