- Joined:
- Sep 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 8,174
- Liked Posts:
- 7,262
- Location:
- Of Semi-Fixed Address
My favorite teams
Well yes, actually I can. I just have to presuppose things, like other needs being taken care off with the bags of money that Poles is required to spend. If the team picks up the top FA offensive and defensive linemen, which is financially the best thing they can do right now, and the best pass rushers are off the board (which is the premise of this topic), then you get the best playmaker in the draft and dont look back.You can easily make the argument that a RB is worth a 1st.
Can you make the argument that a RB is worth a top 5 pick when you consider the Bears are the #1 rushing team, the depth of the FA RB class, the overall ease in which the position can be filled, and the bigger more glaring needs of the team? I don’t think you can make that argument.
As you and I both agree, getting a rookie running back on a cheap contract that can produce like the top RBs is certainly a good investment. The question becomes "is it wasteful?" It is only wasteful when other needs are not met with quality starters. If this team were interested in bringing in a free agent, they can just pay Montgomery (and face all the whines about signing runningbacks to second contracts).