CalebsFingerNails
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 9, 2018
- Posts:
- 512
- Liked Posts:
- 580
3500 yards
25TDs
11Ints
500+ rushing yards
5TDs
25TDs
11Ints
500+ rushing yards
5TDs
sure. Most quoted post and most respondedI don’t believe anyone has paid attention to you
Yep, knocked it out the park with Kevin White and Mitch TrubiskyHe was better before he traded two firsts for Justin Fields.
And destroying the cap spaceYep, knocked it out the park with Kevin White and Mitch Trubisky
Four people quoted your unrealistic post and disliked you per the norm but congrats I guesssure. Most quoted post and most responded
to but sure. Including you. But sure. About as right as you always are.
Also made the bears the oldest roster in the nflAnd destroying the cap space
For your information it's literally impossible for a prediction to be "truth" so there is nothing within the prediction you made that could be considered hurtful by virtue of being truth because what you are claiming as truth has yet to happen and quite possibly and probably will never come to fruition so your assumption is invalid on that basis alone.I guess I hurt some feelings lol. Truth always hurts the most. For the record my knock is on the Bears and not the QB. We have done nothing for him or any of our QBs. There is a reason they fail and not supporting them with talent or coaching is that reason. And here we go again.
even Art Schlicter knows better than to bet against FieldsFields just needs to improve from this list. The bar is low for both institutions . . .realistically doable.
The 25 Chicago Bears starting quarterbacks of the last 20 years, ranked
Two decades, more than two dozen starters, very little success.milwaukeerecord.com
Ohio State QBs in the NFL
*Denotes undrafted free agent
YEAR NAME ROUND RECORD CAREER STATISTICS 1982 Art Schlichter 1 0-6 1,006 yards, 3 TDs, 11 INTs 1985 Mike Tomczak* FA 42-31 16,079 yards, 88 TDs, 106 INTs 1988 Tom Tupa 3 4-9 3,430 yards, 12 TDs, 25 INTs 1992 Kent Graham 8 17-21 7,801 yards, 39 TDs, 33 INTs 1996 Bobby Hoying 3 3-9-1 2,544 yards, 11 TDs, 15 INTs 1999 Joe Germaine 4 0-0 136 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs 2004 Craig Krenzel 5 3-2 718 yards, 3 TDs, 6 INTs 2007 Troy Smith 5 4-4 1,734 yards, 8 TDs, 5 INTs 2011 Terrelle Pryor** 3 3-7 1,994 yards, 9 TDs, 12 INTs 2016 Cardale Jones 4 0-0 96 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INT 2019 Dwayne Haskins 1 3-10 2,804 yards, 12 TDs, 14 INTs
Don't forgets all the gems and playoff success!Yep, knocked it out the park with Kevin White and Mitch Trubisky
Dang. A 4:1 TD/INT ratio with a trash OL?Most importantly, protect the damn football. Needs to have at least 1/2 of turnovers from a year ago (19) in 17 starts.
Probably ~3000 yards passing (the pass protection unless they strike gold on 2 draft picks is going to be garbage), 15 TDs, 4 INTs.
High deep ball accuracy. again as he separates himself from Trevor Lawrence, Mac Jones (without McDaniels) and Zach WIlson.
I buy his accuracy. I buy him saying he’ll get better. I’ll give him a chance to improve where others drafted before him didn’t/couldn’t.Dang. A 4:1 TD/INT ratio with a trash OL?
Collectively.....they have a winning NFL reacord
Individually only Mike Tomczak does.Collectively.....they have a winning NFL reacord
Oh the hypocrisy lmaooooI guess I hurt some feelings lol. Truth always hurts the most. For the record my knock is on the Bears and not the QB. We have done nothing for him or any of our QBs. There is a reason they fail and not supporting them with talent or coaching is that reason. And here we go again.
Well at least @vabearsfan15 and @dabears70 have company on the short bus.He was better before he traded two firsts for Justin Fields.
Bears have never supported their QB,s. They are doing that again. We will get the same results. So it probably will come to fruition as it has repeatedly in our past.For your information it's literally impossible for a prediction to be "truth" so there is nothing within the prediction you made that could be considered hurtful by virtue of being truth because what you are claiming as truth has yet to happen and quite possibly and probably will never come to fruition so your assumption is invalid on that basis alone.