MikeDitkaPolishSausage
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 10,096
- Liked Posts:
- 7,870
- Location:
- Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
Nothing! They are winning the Sooper Buwl this year6 or 7 new coaches................what could go wrong.
Nothing! They are winning the Sooper Buwl this year6 or 7 new coaches................what could go wrong.
Folks aren't paying attention. No team between #10 and #21 needs a qb. No reason for the Steelers to trade up. Would their fear be if the Browns pass up on qb at #2, they would package this year's 2nd and 3rd a n d high picks in '26 to leapfrog Steelers, Otherwise, Steelers can stay put.Steelers trading 21, 2026 1st and 83 for 10 to draft Sanders or Dart.
There is that and there is also the Colts at 14 that absolutely need a QB unless you think ARich and Daniel Jones are the answer, LMFAO.Folks aren't paying attention. No team between #10 and #21 needs a qb. No reason for the Steelers to trade up. Would their fear be if the Browns pass up on qb at #2, they would package this year's 2nd and 3rd a n d high picks in '26 to leapfrog Steelers, Otherwise, Steelers can stay put.
Translation: Steelers fans may have dodged a bullet.Steelers may be left at the altar
Yes. The folks who aren't paying attention are those who repeatedly say you don't need to move up because the team(s) in front of you have different needs. If you want a QB and you're behind Pitt and #21, you trade up.Folks aren't paying attention. No team between #10 and #21 needs a qb. No reason for the Steelers to trade up. Would their fear be if the Browns pass up on qb at #2, they would package this year's 2nd and 3rd a n d high picks in '26 to leapfrog Steelers, Otherwise, Steelers can stay put.
If only the Bears somehow had the #7 overall pick instead of the #10 overall pick, they would now be in prime position to trade it to another team for a mini-haul in returnYes. The folks who aren't paying attention are those who repeatedly say you don't need to move up because the team(s) in front of you have different needs. If you want a QB and you're behind Pitt and #21, you trade up.
In your scenario unless a team wins the Super Bowl it’s meaningless and hinders their draft position?If only the Bears somehow had the #7 overall pick instead of the #10 overall pick, they would now be in prime position to trade it to another team for a mini-haul in return. All they had to do was lose that meaningless season ending game against the Packers
![]()
This is probably the dumbest post on CCS. And that’s saying something.If only the Bears somehow had the #7 overall pick instead of the #10 overall pick, they would now be in prime position to trade it to another team for a mini-haul in return. All they had to do was lose that meaningless season ending game against the Packers
![]()
Holy shit you are patheticIf only the Bears somehow had the #7 overall pick instead of the #10 overall pick, they would now be in prime position to trade it to another team for a mini-haul in return. All they had to do was lose that meaningless season ending game against the Packers
![]()
Between all of the troll threads and posts on this site, this is not close to being “dumb”. You and some others simply “disagree”, that’s all.This is probably the dumbest post on CCS. And that’s saying something.
Do you really think the coaches and players play to lose? If they did I’d pick a new team
p.s. Puck the Fackers
Yikes... We all get it. This is true and everyone agrees it's arguably the worst trade in history, but to admit that while the guy is under contract and on the roster is pretty hilarious. Not saying he did anything wrong cause I don't care, but it's a massive slap in the face to Watson... again, not that Haslam should care I guess.