Free Agency Talk & Rumors - Bears get Dalman 3/$42M, Josh Allen is RICH ($330M contract), DK is a Steeler, Mack back to LAC

PrideisBears

Jordan Sigler’s editor
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Jun 20, 2010
Posts:
40,229
Liked Posts:
29,832
Location:
In the mod forum planning your ban
Excuse me sir…are you really going to leave out back to the future???
Back to the future predicted a cubs World Series win but even a science fiction comedy would predict a Lions Super Bowl win @nc0gnet0 @hyatt151
 

Applefan

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 9, 2015
Posts:
1,153
Liked Posts:
526
Location:
Brooklyn,NY
Steelers trading 21, 2026 1st and 83 for 10 to draft Sanders or Dart.
Folks aren't paying attention. No team between #10 and #21 needs a qb. No reason for the Steelers to trade up. Would their fear be if the Browns pass up on qb at #2, they would package this year's 2nd and 3rd a n d high picks in '26 to leapfrog Steelers, Otherwise, Steelers can stay put.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,573
Liked Posts:
41,318
Folks aren't paying attention. No team between #10 and #21 needs a qb. No reason for the Steelers to trade up. Would their fear be if the Browns pass up on qb at #2, they would package this year's 2nd and 3rd a n d high picks in '26 to leapfrog Steelers, Otherwise, Steelers can stay put.
There is that and there is also the Colts at 14 that absolutely need a QB unless you think ARich and Daniel Jones are the answer, LMFAO.

Of course, they may pass on one but I think that would be incredibly stupid on their part.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,559
Liked Posts:
19,542
Folks aren't paying attention. No team between #10 and #21 needs a qb. No reason for the Steelers to trade up. Would their fear be if the Browns pass up on qb at #2, they would package this year's 2nd and 3rd a n d high picks in '26 to leapfrog Steelers, Otherwise, Steelers can stay put.
Yes. The folks who aren't paying attention are those who repeatedly say you don't need to move up because the team(s) in front of you have different needs. If you want a QB and you're behind Pitt and #21, you trade up.
 

GoDJtop10

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 8, 2024
Posts:
910
Liked Posts:
651
Yes. The folks who aren't paying attention are those who repeatedly say you don't need to move up because the team(s) in front of you have different needs. If you want a QB and you're behind Pitt and #21, you trade up.
If only the Bears somehow had the #7 overall pick instead of the #10 overall pick, they would now be in prime position to trade it to another team for a mini-haul in return :unsure:. All they had to do was lose that meaningless season ending game against the Packers :unsure::oops:
 

BearDown104

Bears Guru
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,550
Liked Posts:
2,227
If only the Bears somehow had the #7 overall pick instead of the #10 overall pick, they would now be in prime position to trade it to another team for a mini-haul in return :unsure:. All they had to do was lose that meaningless season ending game against the Packers :unsure::oops:
In your scenario unless a team wins the Super Bowl it’s meaningless and hinders their draft position?

Beating a divisional rival, ending the year with a win for a young team and making GB go on the road to Philly in the playoffs isn’t “meaningless”, and Virginia got to see the Bears beat GB before passing.
 

Leon Sandcastle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Feb 5, 2013
Posts:
4,671
Liked Posts:
3,879
If only the Bears somehow had the #7 overall pick instead of the #10 overall pick, they would now be in prime position to trade it to another team for a mini-haul in return :unsure:. All they had to do was lose that meaningless season ending game against the Packers :unsure::oops:
This is probably the dumbest post on CCS. And that’s saying something.
Do you really think the coaches and players play to lose? If they did I’d pick a new team



p.s. Puck the Fackers
 

GoDJtop10

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 8, 2024
Posts:
910
Liked Posts:
651
This is probably the dumbest post on CCS. And that’s saying something.
Do you really think the coaches and players play to lose? If they did I’d pick a new team



p.s. Puck the Fackers
Between all of the troll threads and posts on this site, this is not close to being “dumb”. You and some others simply “disagree”, that’s all.

And yes, teams absolutely play to lose. The Bears just literally tanked a season to get the #1 overall pick a couple years ago.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,134
Liked Posts:
2,950
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks

Top