Throwthebones
Member
- Joined:
- Feb 1, 2016
- Posts:
- 222
- Liked Posts:
- 94
I am not against trading for Jimmy but we cant sell the farm to do it
The biggest selling feature of trading for Jimmy G is that it opens us up to draft Myles Garrett.
The biggest selling feature of trading for Jimmy G is that it opens us up to draft Myles Garrett.
Trade for Jimmy G
Some dumb team will.
Yeah if we trade for Jimmy G its going to cost us the pick that would select Myles Garrett. So no.
Jimmy G is not being traded for a top 10 pick.
The Bears would more than likely deal a couple of 2nd round picks.
The biggest selling feature of trading for Jimmy G is that it opens us up to draft Myles Garrett.
Why the fuck does everyone want to trade for a backup game manager who will need to be paid like a seasoned starter immediately? I don't look at other teams' boards but I would bet that this is the only fan base so utterly petrified of drafting a QB. It's absolutely bizarre.
I'd rather keep our 2nd. Deepest CB draft possibly ever. We gonna need that. Anything to get Porter off the field.
So may Luke Falk, Mason Rudolph, and Mitch Trubinsky - at least for now.
I have a feeling Falk and Trubinsky will supplant Watson and Kaaya in the draft order. There will be good value outside the first this year at QB.
I'm hoping a healthy Hall can do that.
They will need at least a nickel though. Maybe a guy that can slide outside since Callahan is a bit of a China doll.
Rivers reportedly has a no-trade clause, per NFL Media's Ian Rapoport (via NFL.com's Kevin Patra), but those things can be worked out as well.