Exactly. Goalie gives up shit goals....and the defence sucks. Goalie has 30 saves...and he carried the team/bailed out the D
Just because the goalie gave up a shit goal doesn't mean that the D is absolved for shitting the bed on the play leading up to the shit goal--or vice-versa. The two are mutually exclusive. Let's be honest here: the Goaltending sucked in the 1st period of game 1, game 2, game 5, and the 1st period of game 6. The Team D sucked in game 1, game 2, game 5, and the 1st period of game 6.
This series I don't thinink the goaltending was inherenly bad for any major stretch, but the Team D mailed in the 2nd of game 1.
I think expectations, however, can't be mutually exclusive. Case in point for both game 2's: If you expect Crawford to play like a 2-time Jennings winner (didn't in game 2 of Nashville, did in Game 2 of Minny), you have to also expect Keith to play like a 2-time Norris winner (didn't in game 2 of Nashville, did in game 2 of Minny). In no way, shape, or form do we win the cup--possibly this year or either of our past cups in the current Hockey era, with any aspect of the team playing bad and another aspect sheltering it. Even in 2010 you can argue that the team D was lights out but it wasn't like Niemi was as bad as Huet--he was "good enough", and the lowest any aspect of our team this year can be is "good enough". We got incredibly lucky against Nashville that the O bailed us out (especially since the O was absent the last few games of the season).