Glennon Is A Week-To-Week Starting QB

[FirstTimer]

4 years with the 5th option. I was referring to 3 after the 2 assumed years.

..and the Bears could exercise the 5th year option...for peanuts...so Trubisky can not leave unilaterally after 3 years, or 4 years, and do you think 5 years from now if he hasn't played he will net a 1st rounder?

What's your point at this juncture of the conversation?

 

[didshereallysaythat]

Yes. $9 million dollars of guaranteed money for a backup QB in today's NFL is nothing.

Do you understand the NFL salary cap structure?

Yes and it would be hard to afford other acquisitions. Plus he would just ride out his contract and go to another team and start. He wouldn't sign that shit.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

..and the Bears could exercise the 5th year option...for peanuts...so Trubisky can not leave unilaterally after 3 years, or 4 years, and do you think 5 years from now if he hasn't played he will net a 1st rounder?

What's your point at this juncture of the conversation?

That eventually he would leave and we would get nothing. 5 years and even if he makes Matt Flynn money, he would take that somewhere else rather than ride the bench till he is over 30 when Glennon finally retires.

 

[FirstTimer]

Yes and it would be hard to afford other acquisitions

No it would not. You don't understand NFL salary structure.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

Of course he wouldn't bet a 1st rounder 5 years later. That's why you have to trade him in 2 if you know Glennon is all pro.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

No it would not. You don't understand NFL salary structure.

Lol, then your like the Saints way of thinking fry.

 

[FirstTimer]

That eventually he would leave and we would get nothing.

So now the goal posts have moved to trading Trubisky after year two because hypothetically in year five he'd move on and the Bears would get nothing.

This is pathetic, even by your standards.

Have a good one.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

So now the goal posts have moved to trading Trubisky after year two because hypothetically in year five he'd move on and the Bears would get nothing.

This is pathetic, even by your standards.

Have a good one.

It's true though.

 

[onebud34]

So now the goal posts have moved to trading Trubisky after year two because hypothetically in year five he'd move on and the Bears would get nothing.

This is pathetic, even by your standards.

Have a good one.

And some team would extend him so he get's starter money too.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

And some team would extend him so he get's starter money too.

Maybe, maybe not.

 

[onebud34]

Maybe, maybe not.

You're backtracking FYI

He was a top QB coming out and the only reason for not playing would be great QB play already on the roster.

A team is going to start him and pay him such.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

You're backtracking FYI

Well that's my opinion.

 

[onebud34]

Well that's my opinion.

To change your opinion?

 

[didshereallysaythat]

To change your opinion?

I didn't change my opinion but if I did I would be within my rights. I mean FT at one point thought Glennon really was the savior.

 

[onebud34]

I didn't change my opinion

Yes you did.

I mean FT at one point thought Glennon really was the savior.

When did this happen? Can you cite this?

 

[didshereallysaythat]

Maybe, maybe not is changing my opinion?

 

[didshereallysaythat]

When did this happen? Can you cite this?

Ask him now.

 

[onebud34]

Maybe, maybe not is changing my opinion?

Compared to this? Yes.

He was a top QB coming out and the only reason for not playing would be great QB play already on the roster.

A team is going to start him and pay him such.

 

[onebud34]

Ask him now.

You made the claim...the onus is on you.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

Compared to this? Yes.

lol