Gordon agrees in principle to deal with Pistons

[TheStig]

??? ?????? wrote:

mlewinth wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

a full season of John and a healthy yr from Kirk and Luol and we will be fine.

Yea we will be just great. Say that in February when Deng has been out for a month after avg 14 pts on 35% shooting. Salmons is a nice 2 guard but he is not a guy you can go to when it counts. How many game winners did Salmons and Kirk hit combined last year? ....Answer....ZERO! This move is devestating to us and I will be laughing at your idiotic ass when we finish the season with 35 wins! This is a big old preemptive I TOLD YOU SO!!

Mark, I think you're too pessimistic when you say that Deng will only shoot 35%. Deng will average 16 points on 47 FG%, but a mediocre TS%.

I think you're too optimistic on the win total. I think 32 wins is about right.

I can see that and I think Deng can return to form next year but long term he won't hold up with playing year round when he goes back to the GB team. Deng is fragile, I think if he were committed to the bulls and skipped GB to strength train every year he could stay healthy but he has proven he won't do that.

 

[??? ??????]

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

DerrickRose1 wrote:

I'd rather have Tyrus on my team than Charlie V. There I said it and I hate Tyrus.

Charlie is hot garbage, there i said it.

Hot garbage or not, he was significantly better than any of our bigs last year. Only after the trade did they even start playing decently. We would have beat Boston if we had him instead of TT.

Id take Noah over him any day of the week.

Charlie last year 16/6 versus Noah's 7/7 on 2 less mpg. Noah may be better than Charlie V next yr or down the road but last year Charlie V was better and till Noah commits himself to coming into camp in shape, he will be nothing more.

Noah's D-Rtg was also only 1 better than Charlie V's. Charlie V. had a better D-Rtg than the Bucks team as a whole actually.

 

[TheStig]

??? ?????? wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

DerrickRose1 wrote:

I'd rather have Tyrus on my team than Charlie V. There I said it and I hate Tyrus.

Charlie is hot garbage, there i said it.

Hot garbage or not, he was significantly better than any of our bigs last year. Only after the trade did they even start playing decently. We would have beat Boston if we had him instead of TT.

Id take Noah over him any day of the week.

Charlie last year 16/6 versus Noah's 7/7 on 2 less mpg. Noah may be better than Charlie V next yr or down the road but last year Charlie V was better and till Noah commits himself to coming into camp in shape, he will be nothing more.

Noah's D-Rtg was also only 1 better than Charlie V's. Charlie V. had a better D-Rtg than the Bucks team as a whole actually.

Thanks P03, btw what does your username mean? I can't read Russian.

 

[??? ??????]

TheStig wrote:

??? ?????? wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

DerrickRose1 wrote:

I'd rather have Tyrus on my team than Charlie V. There I said it and I hate Tyrus.

Charlie is hot garbage, there i said it.

Hot garbage or not, he was significantly better than any of our bigs last year. Only after the trade did they even start playing decently. We would have beat Boston if we had him instead of TT.

Id take Noah over him any day of the week.

Charlie last year 16/6 versus Noah's 7/7 on 2 less mpg. Noah may be better than Charlie V next yr or down the road but last year Charlie V was better and till Noah commits himself to coming into camp in shape, he will be nothing more.

Noah's D-Rtg was also only 1 better than Charlie V's. Charlie V. had a better D-Rtg than the Bucks team as a whole actually.

Thanks P03, btw what does your username mean? I can't read Russian.

It's "Rose Gordon" in Russian. I'm not changing it because of Reinsdorf's idiocy though.

 

[mlewinth]

??? ?????? wrote:

TheStig wrote:

??? ?????? wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

DerrickRose1 wrote:

I'd rather have Tyrus on my team than Charlie V. There I said it and I hate Tyrus.

Charlie is hot garbage, there i said it.

Hot garbage or not, he was significantly better than any of our bigs last year. Only after the trade did they even start playing decently. We would have beat Boston if we had him instead of TT.

Id take Noah over him any day of the week.

Charlie last year 16/6 versus Noah's 7/7 on 2 less mpg. Noah may be better than Charlie V next yr or down the road but last year Charlie V was better and till Noah commits himself to coming into camp in shape, he will be nothing more.

Noah's D-Rtg was also only 1 better than Charlie V's. Charlie V. had a better D-Rtg than the Bucks team as a whole actually.

Thanks P03, btw what does your username mean? I can't read Russian.

It's "Rose Gordon" in Russian. I'm not changing it because of Reinsdorf's idiocy though.

I respect that.....your a positive person

 

[TheStig]

??? ?????? wrote:

TheStig wrote:

??? ?????? wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

TheStig wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

DerrickRose1 wrote:

I'd rather have Tyrus on my team than Charlie V. There I said it and I hate Tyrus.

Charlie is hot garbage, there i said it.

Hot garbage or not, he was significantly better than any of our bigs last year. Only after the trade did they even start playing decently. We would have beat Boston if we had him instead of TT.

Id take Noah over him any day of the week.

Charlie last year 16/6 versus Noah's 7/7 on 2 less mpg. Noah may be better than Charlie V next yr or down the road but last year Charlie V was better and till Noah commits himself to coming into camp in shape, he will be nothing more.

Noah's D-Rtg was also only 1 better than Charlie V's. Charlie V. had a better D-Rtg than the Bucks team as a whole actually.

Thanks P03, btw what does your username mean? I can't read Russian.

It's "Rose Gordon" in Russian. I'm not changing it because of Reinsdorf's idiocy though.

Thats cool, I didn't know there was a Russian translation for Gordon, I have never heard it.

 

[Dpauley23]

By the way Detroit is playing Gordon off the bench. Hopefully they don't play him down the stretch

 

[TheStig]

Dpauley23 wrote:

By the way Detroit is playing Gordon off the bench. Hopefully they don't play him down the stretch

They are trading Rip. They have said it for awhile and they are looking for a big.

 

[Newskoolbulls]

Dpauley23 wrote:

By the way Detroit is playing Gordon off the bench. Hopefully they don't play him down the stretch

RIP will want out ASAP.

 

[Dpauley23]

You know I don't recall Dumars ever saying they were going to trade Rip

 

[ZombieKevie]

since we cant swear on here... DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[ZombieKevie]

were ducked on offense now. unless deng somehow improved shooting 3s

 

[??? ??????]

I think Detroit starts both Gordon and Hamilton.

 

[Newskoolbulls]

??? ?????? wrote:

I think Detroit starts both Gordon and Hamilton.

what about Stuckey?

 

[??? ??????]

Newskoolbulls wrote:

??? ?????? wrote:

I think Detroit starts both Gordon and Hamilton.

what about Stuckey?

Maybe they trade him, otherwise bring him off the bench. Stuckey hasn't been very good as a starter, but he might be able to flourish in a Microwave role.

 

[ZombieKevie]

neither gordon nor hamilton are good on at pg

 

[pinkizdead]

DerrickRose1 wrote:

mlewinth wrote:

DerrickRose1 wrote:

The Bulls fanbase is upsetting me tonight. I love all the Gordon fanboys predicting no playoffs next year. We WILL make the playoffs next year guys. And LOL @ people threatening to leave this team.

Your an idiot

I may be an idiot but at least I know proper grammar.

Ack seriously. is that what we resort to on this forum? if someone attacks your ideas, you attack a laspe in judgment. really grammar mistakes? really? i've been drinking (i really do miss gordon), and i can do better. c'mon keep the ad hominems out of it.

 

[TheStig]

??? ?????? wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

??? ?????? wrote:

I think Detroit starts both Gordon and Hamilton.

what about Stuckey?

Maybe they trade him, otherwise bring him off the bench. Stuckey hasn't been very good as a starter, but he might be able to flourish in a Microwave role.

Common seriously, Rip is gone. There are so many bigs available, I can't see a deal not getting done.

 

[Newskoolbulls]

TheStig wrote:

??? ?????? wrote:

Newskoolbulls wrote:

??? ?????? wrote:

I think Detroit starts both Gordon and Hamilton.

what about Stuckey?

Maybe they trade him, otherwise bring him off the bench. Stuckey hasn't been very good as a starter, but he might be able to flourish in a Microwave role.

Common seriously, Rip is gone. There are so many bigs available, I can't see a deal not getting done.

4 years for an aging star who still thinks he is a star player (look out how well AI worked out)

 

[??? ??????]

ZombieKevie wrote:

neither gordon nor hamilton are good on at pg

Neither was Billups before he came to Detroit.