Myk
85in25
- Joined:
- Sep 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,839
- Liked Posts:
- 5,330
I'm very confused by a 2nd round WR people are calling a steal at #39 after we already have a 1st round #24th on a recent contract and a 1st round 9th on a rookie contract. And then a #10 TE plus a #43 TE.
All while being told that we're going to run 2 WR and 2 TE sets when we weren't able to get the ball to 3 WRs and 2 TEs.
I guess we're set for depth as far as the weapons go. If we're ever able to get the ball to them they might get banged up.
Maybe BJ looked at Scott and laughed at Poles saying you don't get a WR in the 4th and then keep him because your WR in the 3rd sucked ass.
Maybe having all this talent wrapped up in to offensive weapons is how real teams do it.
Is this even legal? Too much offensive talent on the field, game forfeited.
It's all just very confusing.
Throw in the OT and DT and I guess it's OK but I was always told it takes top 10 talent to be dline and figured it would take the same amount of talent to play against them. Maybe 2nd round trench talent is OK.
All while being told that we're going to run 2 WR and 2 TE sets when we weren't able to get the ball to 3 WRs and 2 TEs.
I guess we're set for depth as far as the weapons go. If we're ever able to get the ball to them they might get banged up.
Maybe BJ looked at Scott and laughed at Poles saying you don't get a WR in the 4th and then keep him because your WR in the 3rd sucked ass.
Maybe having all this talent wrapped up in to offensive weapons is how real teams do it.
Is this even legal? Too much offensive talent on the field, game forfeited.
It's all just very confusing.
Throw in the OT and DT and I guess it's OK but I was always told it takes top 10 talent to be dline and figured it would take the same amount of talent to play against them. Maybe 2nd round trench talent is OK.